Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

ZazenCodes Agentic Coding Club

143 members • Free

Clief Notes

40k members • Free

AI Automation Society

415.3k members • Free

AI Automation Agency Hub

327.3k members • Free

Chase AI Community

69.3k members • Free

AI Accelerator

19.6k members • Free

WavyWorld

49.6k members • Free

BowTiedCyber Hoodies

4k members • Free

E-com Growth Partners (LM)

313 members • Free

24 contributions to Clief Notes
🏆 WEEKLY COMP #8: THE WILDCARD 🏆
🎟️ PRIZE: FREE SEAT IN THE LYCEUM 🎟️ Pick your cohort. Technical, Business, or Creator. Your call. ---- 📋 THE CHALLENGE You are the client this week. No fictional Marcus. No fictional Sarah. No fictional Devon. Pick a real problem in your own life or work. Build the folder-based specialist you wish you had. This is the capstone of Month 2. The challenge flips. Instead of building for someone else, you write your own brief and solve it for yourself. ---- 🎯 THE TWIST The hard part isn't building. The hard part is scoping. Picking the right problem is harder than solving the wrong one. Most people pick problems that are too small or too vague. The skill this week is treating yourself like a real client. Be specific about what's broken. Be specific about what you need. Don't pick "I want to be more productive." Pick "I waste two hours every Sunday night writing the same kind of LinkedIn carousel posts and I need a folder that handles 80% of the draft work so I can focus on the hook and the visuals." That's a real brief. Specific problem. Specific scope. Specific desired output. ---- 🗂️ TWO DELIVERABLES THIS WEEK This is the only week with two pieces: 1️⃣ Your own client brief. 250 words or less. Describe the problem you're solving for yourself. Treat yourself like a real client. What's broken? What have you already tried? What do you need? 2️⃣ The folder system that solves it. Same structure as every week: - 📄 identity.md - 📐 rules.md - 💬 examples.md - 📚 reference/ - 📖 README.md Your brief lives at the top of the repo as brief.md so judges can read it before they look at the folder. ---- 🔥 THE ANGLE THIS WEEK Anyone can follow a brief. Writing your own, then solving it, then shipping it as a usable folder is a portfolio piece that demonstrates judgment, not just execution. This is the skill that separates "AI hobbyist" from "AI builder." Anyone can prompt their way through a problem someone else handed them. Scoping a problem, designing the solution, and shipping it as a system is what real work looks like. 💪
The video below is the live demo, not a mockup: Lucía pastes her situation and structure-call-ar computes which monotributo category she's really in (cat G, 92.8%, already crossed) and the exact month her rolling-12 forces the next jump into cat H. The design choice that carries the most weight splits the work in two: it owns the deterministic trigger (the category, the crossing month) and hands the complex choice (jump to RI, answer a recat de oficio) to your contador by name, asking for inputs instead of guessing. You paste six structural inputs, it commits to the verdict, and it hands you a Reviewer Brief you can drop straight on your contador's desk. Bilingual, calibrated to june 2026, MIT. repo: github.com/Nicopatron/structure-call-ar landing: https://structure-call-ar.vercel.app/
🎆 THE LAST SALE EVER — HELP US GET TO VEGAS 🎆
🎯 WE READ ALL OF YOUR RESPONSES. HERE'S WHAT'S NEXT (AND A BIG ASK) A couple weeks ago we asked you what you wanted Clief Notes to become. You showed up. You wrote real, thoughtful answers, some of you wrote essays. We read every single one. Twice. So before anything else: thank you. This post is us answering you. 💬 YOU TOLD US. HERE'S WHAT WE'RE BUILDING. You said you want a clearer path from learning ICM to actually getting paid for it. → It's coming. A real learning-to-earning track, plus a talent platform we're building to connect you with people who want to hire what you can do. Heads up: the talent platform will be Premium and VIP only, one more reason to lock in below. You said competitions without feedback don't help you grow. → Fixed. Going forward, every single entrant gets tailored feedback on their build, not just the winner. We're moving to two competitions a month so we can do it right. And both monthly winners get a 30-minute call with me. You said the best builds get buried in the feed. → We're building a tagged library so you can actually find "ICM setups for solo operators" or "small team, non-coder" instead of scrolling for an hour. You said you couldn't map all the pieces, Skool, Discord, the Lyceum, ICM, what each tier unlocks. → A single orientation page is on the way. One place that breaks all of it down so nobody's lost. You said you want to connect with each other. → We hear you. Meetups, pairing, and a recorded "After Tea" hangout are on the table. South Florida alone has over 1,000 of you. Let's use that. You said we've felt spread thin. → The most honest one. You're right. We're bringing on real help to run the day-to-day so the community gets consistency, and so Matt and I can keep building the things above instead of dropping balls. You called it, and we're fixing it. 📍 QUICK NOTE ON ICM: a few of you asked for "ICM with Copilot" or "ICM with n8n, Sheets, GoHighLevel." Good news, ICM already works with any model and feeds straight into the tools you're using. It's the structure underneath all of them, not a separate thing you have to relearn per tool. If that's not landing for you, that's on us to make clearer, and we will.
the learning-to-earning track and Ledger are the pieces i've been waiting for. ICM is the easy part once you get it, turning it into work you get paid for is where most people stall. excited to see that one ship! now go get vegas 🎆
Come hang out on LinkedIn! 📲 (40 Members and Counting!)
A handful of folks from here have started connecting and sharing each other’s content on LinkedIn. Thought it would be nice to have a group over there where we can all contribute to and share our content to a wider audience through our connections. Hopefully continue to drive more folks to the conversations here as well. Please join if you’d like to connect! There’s already 20 of us in there after one day! Go boost your network. https://www.linkedin.com/groups/31160010
@Don Roy great idea! Will join
🏆 WEEKLY COMP #6: THE RESEARCHER 🏆
🎟️ PRIZE: FREE SEAT IN THE LYCEUM 🎟️ Pick your cohort. Technical, Business, or Creator. Your call. ---- 🇺🇸 Quick note first. This post is going up Today because we took Memorial Day off yesterday. To keep things fair, you've got until Sunday May 31st at 12:00 PM EST to submit. Same week of build time, just shifted. ---- 📋 THE CHALLENGE Build a folder-based AI researcher for a specific topic or industry. You pick the domain. This week's deliverable is one researcher folder that someone could drop into a Claude project and use as their personal research partner for whatever domain you've built it for. ---- 🎯 PICK YOUR DOMAIN The domain is yours. Pick something specific. Pick something you'd actually use. A few sparks to get you thinking: - 🏦 M&A activity in one industry (fintech, healthcare, defense) - ⚖️ Court cases in one area of law (employment, IP, immigration) - 🧬 Scientific research on one health condition or treatment - 🏘️ Real estate market dynamics in one city or asset class - 🥊 Competitive intelligence for one product category - 📜 Historical research on one period, place, or movement - 📚 Academic literature in one specific subfield - 📋 Regulatory developments in one sector - 📰 Journalism research on one beat (climate tech, AI policy, biotech funding) The more specific, the better. "Research assistant" is too broad. "M&A research analyst for early-stage fintech deals in the US and Europe" is right. ---- 🗂️ THE METHODOLOGY If this is your first comp, welcome. Here's what you need to know: This week (and every week) you're learning interpretable context methodology. Folders as architecture. Each file does one job well. Your researcher is a folder with five things: - 📄 identity.md (who the researcher is, what domain they cover) - 📐 rules.md (how they research) - 💬 examples.md (what good looks like) - 📚 reference/ (frameworks, source lists, key concepts) - 📖 README.md (how to use it)
second-witness is a due-diligence researcher for one decision: should you adopt this AI tool, build on it, or walk away. You paste it a vendor claim ("sub-50ms p99," "beats GPT on coding," "99.9% uptime") and instead of summarizing the pitch back at you, it asks what decision rests on the claim, tiers every source by its witness, goes and hunts the independent one, and hands back a map: what's confirmed, what a two-week pilot would settle, and the one thing you won't know until you're already in production. It's built for CTOs, founders, and consultants weighing an AI-infrastructure bet that's expensive to undo: vector DBs, RAG and agent frameworks, model providers, managed AI vendors. Repo: github.com/Nicopatron/second-witness Live overview: nicopatron.github.io/second-witness
🏆 WEEKLY COMP #5: THE COACH 🏆
💰 $500 CASH 💰 Win this and you've covered a year of Premium with $175 left over. 📋 THE CHALLENGE Build a folder-based AI coach for a specific domain. You pick the domain. This week's deliverable is one coach folder that someone could drop into a Claude project and use as their personal coach for whatever you've built it for. 🎯 PICK YOUR DOMAIN The domain is yours. Pick something specific. Pick something you'd actually use. A few sparks to get you thinking: - 🎤 Public speaking coach for new managers giving their first big presentations - 💼 Salary negotiation coach for tech workers at Series A startups - 📞 Cold call coach for first-year SDRs in B2B software - 🎯 Interview prep coach for product manager roles - ✍️ Writing coach for one specific genre (sci-fi short stories, college essays, op-eds) - 🏋️ Fitness form coach for one movement (squat, deadlift, golf swing) - 🌍 Language learning coach for one use case (medical Spanish, business Mandarin) - ♟️ Chess coach for one specific opening or endgame pattern - ⚽ Youth athletics coach for one sport and age group The more specific, the better. "Life coach" is too broad. "Salary negotiation coach for tech workers at Series A startups" is right. 🗂️ THE METHODOLOGY If this is your first comp, welcome. Here's what you need to know: This week (and every week) you're learning the foundation of interpretable context methodology. Folders as architecture. Each file does one job well. Your coach is a folder with five things: - 📄 identity.md (who the coach is) - 📐 rules.md (how they coach) - 💬 examples.md (what good looks like) - 📚 reference/ (frameworks, drills, source material) - 📖 README.md (how to use it) Drop the folder into a Claude project. Claude becomes the coach. Reusable. Shareable. Portable. 🔥 THE ANGLE THIS WEEK A coach is NOT a knowledge base. A coach gives feedback. Pushes back. Asks better questions. Holds people accountable.
1 like • May 24
https://github.com/Nicopatron/animal-grief-coach Nick, a coach for the parent in the kitchen at midnight after the dog was put down that afternoon, kid 6 to 14 meeting real death for the first time. It doesn't teach you what to say. You write a euphemism: "I told him she went to a better place", and it asks whether you said that to the kid or to yourself. That's the whole move. Matches the language you wrote in, English or Spanish. Test 1 of JUDGE_GUIDE.md is two minutes if you want to check.
1-10 of 24
Nicolas Patron Uriburu
4
58points to level up
@nicolas-patron-uriburu-3387
Global Business Manager / AI Growth Partner Consultant

Active 10h ago
Joined Mar 9, 2026
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Powered by