@Zack Niziolek hey Zack 👋 I like the clean direction here. The branding feels polished, and “Classic tea. Daily purpose.” gives FORM a simple, premium feel. -- ✅ What I’d keep: The hero visual works well. The cans immediately make the product real, and the overall design feels consistent. I also like that you’re transparent about FORM still being in development and inviting people into the process. -- 🧪 What I’d test first: For me, the biggest missing piece is WHO this is really for and WHY they should care. Right now I learn a lot about FORM - green and black tea, creatine, sweeteners, formulation - but I’m still not completely sure who the ideal person is or what problem this solves better than other drinks. That’s the part I’d bring much higher. Something like: “For [specific type of person] who wants [specific outcome] without [main frustration].” Then your product details explain why FORM is different. A few smaller things I noticed too: I wouldn’t repeat “FORM / Classic tea. Daily purpose.” again in the opening lines. That space is valuable and the hero already says it. You’re only using 1 of the 6 visual tiles right now. I’d use a few more to show the product, use case, ingredients or the development story. “Join us to:” explains participation, but I’d still finish with one very clear CTA telling me what you want me to do next. For me, the product already looks interesting. I just need the page to tell me faster: Is this for me, and why would I choose FORM? 🔥

@Lindsey Ciarrocca 🔥 I think your strongest positioning is already sitting right at the top of the page. -- ✅ What I’d keep: “For women who EARN WELL and still worry about money.” That’s strong because it gives me both the person and the tension immediately. This isn’t “I need to make more money.” It’s “I’m doing well... so why does money still feel stressful?” -- 🧪 What I’d test first: I’d carry that exact idea more strongly into the 90-day promise. Once I reach the bullets, the page starts to sound a little more like a general money/budgeting program: - know where every dollar goes - save consistently - deal with debt - balance bills and saving - build confidence All useful, but the thing that makes your positioning different gets a bit diluted. I’d test one umbrella promise before those bullets, something along the lines of: “In 90 days, turn a good income into a money system you trust - so you can save consistently, spend without guilt, and stop wondering where it all went.” Then the bullets underneath explain HOW that happens rather than each trying to be a separate promise. -- For me, the gold here is not just “manage money better.” It’s: “I earn well, but I still don’t feel good about money.” I’d make the whole page keep pulling on that thread. 🔥

@Lindsey Ciarrocca you are welcome Lindsey :)

@Adal Bueno 🔥 I like the direction here. The hero feels personal and distinctive, and the whole page has a nice visual identity already. -- ✅ What I’d keep: The personal branding in the hero works really well, and I like that the page quickly shows this is about building something in public, not just consuming more content. The proof lower down - 225,000+ LinkedIn followers + 3,000+ Skool members - also gives me a good reason to believe you’ve actually done this yourself. -- 🧪 What I’d test first: For me, the biggest question is still the positioning around “How I” + “creators with a project in mind.” “How I” feels slightly unfinished on its own - almost like the beginning of a sentence or part of a series. And “a project in mind” makes me think of something already defined. Personally, I’m more likely to start with an IDEA and then turn that into something real. So I’d test something simpler like: FOR CREATORS BUILDING SOMETHING That feels broader, more natural and very aligned with “Build in public.” One more thing: “Share your progress. Get feedback. Get shit done.” I understand what you’re going for, but “shit” feels a little out of place to me here. The rest of the visuals and branding feel warm, thoughtful and quite polished. That one word suddenly gives it a much rougher, more rebellious tone than everything around it. I’d probably test: Share your progress. Get feedback. Get it done. Same meaning, but more consistent with the rest of the brand. Small visual note too - slides 2-5 look well designed, but some of the text feels pretty small. I’d definitely check those on mobile. And I’d change the final CTA. “To start, post one line...” feels more like an onboarding instruction after I’ve joined. On the About Page I’d keep the job simpler - give me a reason to click JOIN. Something like: “Join free and build in public with people building alongside you.” Then tell me what to post once I’m inside. 🔥

@Adal Bueno you are welcome Adal

@Rasheed Hooda 🔥 I like the direction here. There are a couple of lines that already feel very “you” and give the page some personality. For me, the main opportunity is making the promise a little easier to grasp faster. -- ✅ What I’d keep: “There are 7 days in a week. Someday is not one of them.” That’s probably the line I remember most after reading the whole thing. And I like this too: “...we reject the idea that you have to put your life on hold to make a living.” That gives Self-Sustaining Life Lab a real point of view. -- 🧪 What I’d test first: I think the missing piece is making “self-sustaining” more concrete. Right now I understand the philosophy - stop waiting and start living - but I’m still not completely sure what I’m actually joining to build. The line that caught my attention most was: “...start living the life you want while finding ways to make it pay for itself.” That feels like the real promise hiding in the middle of the copy. I’d test bringing that idea much higher and explaining it in one very simple sentence. Something along the lines of: “Build a life you want to live now - and create practical ways for it to help pay for itself.” Only if that accurately describes what you help people do, of course. For me, that would make the jump from $5/year to $27/month easier to understand too - not because you added more features, but because I understand much faster what I’m actually here to change. 🔥

@Rasheed Hooda 🔥 ah, yes - that actually helps me understand the idea much better. “We’re not building businesses. We’re building lives that pay for themselves.” That may be the line the rest of the page hangs off. I’d definitely test bringing that idea much higher, because it separates you from the usual “build a business / side hustle” message straight away. Maybe even: “We’re not here to build a business around your life. we’re building a life that can help pay for itself.” That feels much closer to what you’re really trying to say.

@Paulo Costa, The Roaster I think @Aimee Jardon may have put her finger on something here with “What work?” Because the more I think about it, I’m not really coming here to POST something. I’m coming because I want a second pair of eyes on what I made before I send it out into the world 😄 That’s why “POST THE WORK” may be slightly off. I’d be curious to test: CHECK BEFORE IT GOES LIVE. or, with almost no change to your current version: CHECK WHAT YOU BUILT. Then keep “I’LL TAG RELEVANT REVIEWERS” underneath, because that part is strong and explains why this group is useful. Feels a little closer to the real benefit for me - catch something I missed before my audience does 🔥

@Paulo Costa, The Roaster yes, now I see why you want to keep POST there. If people are still asking how to actually get roasted, then the mechanic probably needs to win over clever copy here 😄 And thinking about your current version again, I actually prefer: POST WHAT YOU BUILT. I’LL TAG RELEVANT REVIEWERS. over “POST YOUR WORK.” “What you built” feels more concrete to me. I’ve made something, I’m not sure it’s ready yet, so I put that version here for another pair of eyes before I make the final call. That feels very close to what actually happens in the group 🔥