Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Clief Notes

31.7k members • Free

41 contributions to Clief Notes
🏆 WEEKLY COMP #4 RESULTS: THE AGENCY (CORRECTED) 🏆
I need to walk back this morning's announcement before anything else. @Ariel Ortiz is not a Premium or VIP member. The competition was Premium and VIP only, stated in bold in the original brief. That eligibility check should have happened before judging and it didn't. That's on me. The $325 and the Week 4 title go to @Ruby Sparks. The rest of the writeup stands. Repeating it here so the corrected results live in one place. ➖➖➖ 🏆 WINNER: @Ruby Sparks 🏆 🔗 Repo: https://github.com/sparkles-inc/agency-os 🌐 Live site: https://agency-os-tan-five.vercel.app/ Ruby was within an inch of taking it on the original call. The judging call between her build and Ariel's was the longest I've sat with on any comp. She earned this on the work alone. The Loom video she recorded for this submission is the cleanest voice work I've heard on any community submission. Full-on infomercial quality. Voice acting level. If you haven't watched it yet, go watch it. It's a master class in how to present a build. Beyond the voice: an animated handoff explainer on the companion site, a WRITEUP.md that compresses the entire submission into three paragraphs of clean argument, and a design philosophy made explicit. She refused typed schemas in favor of human-readable Handoff Cards with seven sections including a required Gaps field ("if Gaps is empty, you're not looking hard enough"). One continuous narrative thread runs through all 27 files of her repo. Ruby takes the $325. @Sonija Quinn will reach out to Ruby directly for payment details. Remember: in a world where AI is making it easier to build, it's the unique opinions and styles that become valuable. ➖➖➖ I thought last week was hard to judge. This was the hardest comp to judge so far. Not even close.
1 like • 11h
Rules... Consequences... IYKYK
Claude Projects doesn't accept folders
Claude Projects doesn't accept folders, only files. So the usual ICM layout (CLAUDE.md at root, /protocols, /reference, /templates, /examples) won't upload as is. What I did: - Flattened everything into a single folder. Renamed each file with its folder as a prefix, e.g. protocols/guardrails.md became protocols_guardrails.md. Keeps the origin visible in the filename. - Updated every internal reference inside the files so the File Map and cross-links point to the new flat names. - Pasted the body of CLAUDE.md into the Project's Custom Instructions field. CLAUDE.md has no special status in Projects (unlike Claude Code), so the orchestration rules need to live in the instructions box to actually govern behaviour. - Uploaded the other files as Project knowledge. Done. The File Map still works as a routing index. Early days but the structure holds.
1 like • 2d
@Andrew Carter the compartalization that it provides. Meaning that you can customize the model into a specific use case with the specific set of instructions and permanent files as context for whatever outcome you are trying to produce in any particular domain of your choosing. I also started updating my most used projects with ICM framework in an attempt to make more efficient the tokenomics, and more effective the desired outputs. Where the instructions act as the router, and the permanent files are the context, examples, and special instructions.
1 like • 23h
@Andrew Carter It has improved the quality of output, the quantity of output, and token consumption is more efficient (the limits are farther out in adaptive thinking). Overall it's a W. Instructions only route to permanently attached files, and I can create custom Skills that are only invoked on need basis.
Is Claude Set To Become Obsolete?
Like many young people today, I started my AI journey with ChatGPT. I am not a software engineer and have always preferred less tech in my life in general, I still prefer to read physical books today. For me, ChatGPT was first just a fancy Google, helping me find information a little quicker and answering random questions that I would think of. But it also turned into a gateway drug for what AI could do, and it wasn't until a friend told me about agentic AI that those lightbulb moments started to happen. Suddenly I could create my own website or app. I could create specific things to make MY life easier. And then it hit me, NOW I CAN DO THIS FOR SOMEONE ELSE... AND GET PAID! And like that I dove head-first, oblivious and clueless, but motivated and excited about the possibilities. Did I find Grok or Claude? NO I found MANUS AI, and after 4 months, 6 websites and 2 apps, I decided it was time to learn about Claude, I mean, all the "techies" I see can't stop talking about it! So I find Clief Notes... Now I'm realizing just how much this agentic AI has been doing for me... And I can also see how easily it could make AI models like Claude obsolete. Could I be wrong? ABSOLUTELY! But while the right person could do everything in Claude that Manus can do, I'm left wondering what happens when the next update just destroys everything else and if I should solely focus on agentic AI instead. I know I seem like a "doomsdayer", and I am no engineer or AI expert, but I can't help wondering what Claude can do that some of these high-end agentic AI models can do I would love to know your thoughts and PLEASE prove me wrong so that I can know!
1 like • 4d
@Jeremy Gaudlitz Thanks for sharing part of your journey. To answer your question I would say: 1. Keep learning and experimenting with tools that you find interesting or atrracted to. If it's a really popular tool, it will most likely be absorbed by one of the Big 5 (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Muse). The edge that this will give you is that you will already know the capabilities of the tool acquired and can call it on its new platforrn, or recreate a functionality of it for your personal workflow. 2. These big companies will copy each other on features to appeal more to general masses. Case in point, Meta acquired Manus for what it could do; you can use Muse (Meta's flagship model) and work with it for the sole purpose of how you were using Manus, or recreate with ICM the functionalities of Manus for yourself. Granted this is all work, but building is the fastest way to gain experience. 3. Stay up to date with whatever it is that you are paying attention to, if its worth it for the companies they will end up taking it, if not it will be community supported.
2 likes • 4d
Excellent try. Building is gaining experience. Quick questions: - Did you edit it? Does it have layers stitched together (as in the audio and the video clips?
🏁 Your Stack 2.1 Check-In
Description: Remote Control is built into Claude Code now. One command, a QR code, and you're connected from your phone. But the real question this lesson asks: do you actually need it? Not everyone does. If you're rarely away from your desk during builds, you probably don't. Where do you land?
Poll
20 members have voted
0 likes • 4d
I would rather close the laptop, go to dinner, and not think about anything on family time lol
1-10 of 41
Mister P. Ap
3
4points to level up
@mister-project-7028
I live to serve

Active 9h ago
Joined Apr 21, 2026
Powered by