Hey. Let’s start a new movement. Call it HC — Human Connection. Not a brand. Not a platform. Just a reminder. Everyone’s building online empires right now. Look deep behind the purpose and what are YOU ACTUALLY DOING! Automations, funnels, AI doing the talking. Life optimized, scheduled, outsourced. For the first ones it was easy. Can we really just all do the same and scale millions online?where is the VALUE TRULY created? Who is planting the organic food, making the smoothies, who is actually sustaining the high lifestyle. Is the person working in the fancy places we go having truly the same chance.and freedom? And still many who run online businesses are overworked, somehow trying to lead movement! New earth community. It's not only here. It's a paradigm. We give it the meaning. Community. What a big word!we give it the essence! IF you would have children(like me) you potentially would see what a bad example of life we give. The online generation! Is it truly healthy to show them that this is the best way to live? I am not HERE to criticize. I am even asking this questions to myself, asking myself how I truly wanna live Life! And yeah — some of it is useful. Some of it is brilliant. Feels easy. But somewhere along the way, it got easy to forget that the real power was never in the tools. We teach machines how to write like us. Think like us. Create like us. And then we wonder why things start feeling… empty. Soon they gonna outsource you, cause superComputer will not need you to sell the courses you crated in the first place. They may will learn to have a bank account and will control your money:( So HC is simple. Human connection. More eye contact. More sitting together without an agenda. More hands in the soil. More real conversations that don’t disappear after 24 hours. It’s choosing presence over performance. People over profiles. Life that’s lived, not just posted. This isn’t anti-technology. It’s pro-human. I live in a community since 10years where we learn and walk this with elders!

I’ve been reflecting on something lately, and I’m genuinely curious how others see it. It concerns contemporary spirituality and personal development culture. There is so much language today about: • sovereignty • alignment • stepping into your highest self • expanding your capacity • becoming more powerful • building your own container And at first glance, much of this sounds healthy. Especially for wounded people. Healing matters. Growth matters. Learning to stand upright matters. But I find myself asking: What is the final direction of this growth? Is it toward deeper communion , or toward a more refined form of self-centeredness? In the Christian tradition (and especially in the Eastern understanding of theosis), the goal of spiritual ascent is not self-expansion but participation in divine life. To become “like God” does not mean becoming sovereign and self-defining. It means becoming self-giving. God is not an isolated super-self. God is communion. Love poured out. If the cup is filled with divine love, the natural movement is overflow. First toward family, then friends, then community, and ultimately the world. Not: “How do I enlarge my cup?” But: “How do I let it pour?” What I sometimes sense in modern spirituality is a subtle shift. The starting point is often healing wounded individuals. This is good. But if the path never moves beyond “my alignment,” “my energy,” “my fulfillment,” then the ascent stalls. It can even invert. Because a spirituality centered on “my highest good” risks becoming a polished form of egocentrism, even if it feels expansive, powerful, luminous. There is a real difference between: • being filled so you can give and • being filled so you can feel more full. One leads to communion. The other can quietly lead to isolation, even if it feels intoxicating. This doesn’t mean self-denial in a pathological way. It doesn’t mean pleasing others at the expense of well-being. On the contrary: You must be rooted, healed, strengthened.

I’m Swedish. Sweden is perhaps the world’s most secular and atheistic/agnostic country. Therefore it makes me both happy and proud to see a Swedish professor publish a peer-reviewed scientific article arguing what mystic traditions have already held for centuries. Universal consciousness as foundational field: A theoretical bridge between quantum physics and non-dual philosophy https://pubs.aip.org/aip/adv/article/15/11/115319/3372193/Universal-consciousness-as-foundational-field-A

Have you ever heard that your craving for either sugar or salt says something about your deeper desires? I've been testing this, and honestly the results have been scary? Do you crave salt or sugar more? I personally have a serious problem with sugar. Well what do you think of this? If you crave salt, you are craving adventure in your life. If you crave sugar, you long for more love and attention. Well, does this align with you?

What the world needs, perhaps now more than ever, is love. But what is love? I guess there could be as many definitions as there are people. Share yours! I’ve spent a lot of time with the question the past year and personally I’ve landed in articulating it as; Love is to genuinely want the best for another. Curious to hear how you define love.