Logical flow of information
Most research papers don’t get rejected because of “bad data” – they lose readers because the story doesn’t flow. If a reviewer has to work to reconstruct your logic, you have already lost half the battle. Logical flow is the skill that turns results into a convincing paper. It’s also 100% learnable. 1. Start with the storyline Before writing sections, write the story in 3–4 sentences: - What is the problem or gap? - What did you do about it? - What did you find? - Why does it matter? If you cannot explain this mini‑story clearly, the paper will struggle to flow. Use this as your guide when deciding what belongs in each section and what is a distraction. 2. Use a simple global structure A clear macro‑structure automatically creates flow. A helpful way to think about it is: - WHY – Why is this problem important? (Introduction) - HOW – How did you investigate it? (Methods) - WHAT – What did you find? (Results) - SO WHAT – What do the findings mean? (Discussion/Conclusion) Check that each section answers its question and leads naturally into the next. If the reader ever has to “jump” mentally, add a bridge sentence at the end of the previous section. 3. Make paragraphs do one job Flow collapses when paragraphs try to do too many things at once. Aim for: - One paragraph = one clear idea. - First sentence: topic sentence (what this paragraph is about). - Middle: evidence, examples, reasoning. - Last sentence: link forward (how this connects to the next step in the argument). If you cannot label a paragraph’s main job in 3–4 words (e.g., “gap in methods”, “key result 1”), it is probably overloaded and needs splitting. 4. Build sentence-level bridges Within paragraphs, flow depends on how sentences connect: - Start with familiar information (what you just said), then add new information. - Reuse key terms instead of constantly changing labels. - Use deliberate signposting phrases: *“In contrast…” *“As a result…” *“Building on this…”