Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Research Career Club

583 members • Free

14 contributions to Research Career Club
Update on use of AI in literature reviews
For the past few days I’ve been testing AnswerThis as a tool to write my literature reviews. So far it’s OKish but still learning. I would certainly not use the raw output from the tool in my paper. It does good job at summarising key points in the papers, but it doesn’t go deep enough to the level I usually do in my reviews. Helpful to identify literature sources thought. Have you tried it? P.S. Would reviews of such tools be useful?
Update on use of AI in literature reviews
2 likes • 18d
I have not tried it yet. Previously i used Web of Science Research Assistant which has the literature review part. But based on the papers it cites i would still go and verify them. Definitely the review of such tools would still be useful.
Logical flow of information
Most research papers don’t get rejected because of “bad data” – they lose readers because the story doesn’t flow. If a reviewer has to work to reconstruct your logic, you have already lost half the battle. Logical flow is the skill that turns results into a convincing paper. It’s also 100% learnable. 1. Start with the storyline Before writing sections, write the story in 3–4 sentences: - What is the problem or gap? - What did you do about it? - What did you find? - Why does it matter? If you cannot explain this mini‑story clearly, the paper will struggle to flow. Use this as your guide when deciding what belongs in each section and what is a distraction. 2. Use a simple global structure A clear macro‑structure automatically creates flow. A helpful way to think about it is: - WHY – Why is this problem important? (Introduction) - HOW – How did you investigate it? (Methods) - WHAT – What did you find? (Results) - SO WHAT – What do the findings mean? (Discussion/Conclusion) Check that each section answers its question and leads naturally into the next. If the reader ever has to “jump” mentally, add a bridge sentence at the end of the previous section. 3. Make paragraphs do one job Flow collapses when paragraphs try to do too many things at once. Aim for: - One paragraph = one clear idea. - First sentence: topic sentence (what this paragraph is about). - Middle: evidence, examples, reasoning. - Last sentence: link forward (how this connects to the next step in the argument). If you cannot label a paragraph’s main job in 3–4 words (e.g., “gap in methods”, “key result 1”), it is probably overloaded and needs splitting. 4. Build sentence-level bridges Within paragraphs, flow depends on how sentences connect: - Start with familiar information (what you just said), then add new information. - Reuse key terms instead of constantly changing labels. - Use deliberate signposting phrases: *“In contrast…” *“As a result…” *“Building on this…”
1 like • Dec '25
The timing of this post is very interesting. I recently read an article that states how storytelling is becoming increasingly important to industries and big tech companies. I believe this logical flow your mentioning prof definitely ties into how to become a good storyteller.
Tomorrow’s Q&A postponed
Hiya all - I’ve got asked to join a session with our local policymakers tomorrow so won’t be able to run the session. I’ll reschedule asap. In the meantime, leave any questions you may have below.
1 like • Dec '25
Prof Dawid, I have a question for the upcoming Q&A. A recent article in The Wall Street Journal noted that companies are increasingly seeking storytelling skill sets, with job postings mentioning “storyteller” having doubled this year. From your perspective, how can PhD candidates/researchers effectively leverage the skills they develop through writing research papers and delivering scientific presentations (through conferences) to become great storytellers for industry and non-academic audiences? Thank you
What is your best advice for writing research papers?
I know all of us come from different backgrounds and education systems. We've all received different training. If you've already published, please share the one thing that helps you write your papers. If you're still about to write or are currently writing, please do share what you're struggling with. For me, I develop a detailed outline for my paper first, which includes my novelty statement, key messages, and detailed bullet points for each section. Once I'm happy with this structure, I start to write the full paper.
3 likes • Dec '25
Currently in the writing phase still. I have many struggles but will try to list some key ones here; (1) How to differentiate the paper content from thesis content. For instance, sometimes i hear bullet points are not recommended, or having assumptions in methodology, and other things that are not preferable, Where do we draw the line in this case? (2) In the methodology, i tend to explain more things than what's required and get lost in trying to explain everything and it may end up being excessive. (3) in the results and discussion, for instance graphs and tables, i tend to explain every single trend or detail which is not very good and i miss what is the overall key message from that figure or table. These are some struggles i face. On a separate note Prof. I would like to know how did you use to track your simulations? and changes you would make in order not to get lost. Especially since this comes into play during the methodology and potentially during review stages. i think this would be a question for the next Q&A session. Thank you
1 like • Dec '25
@Dawid Hanak Thank you Prof
2 rejections in 2 days...
Rejection is part of being academic - the sooner we accept it in our careers, the less it will impact our wellbeing. Yet even as a professor who submitted hundreds of proposals and won dozens of projects over the past decade, I still feel really deflated after receiving rejections on 2 consecutive days. I know it's part of the game, but I still question whether this is what I want to do with my life. I know you may be facing the same challenges, so here is what I do to get back to the 'motivated' state of mind: - I engage in DIY activity at home to take my mind off it. My current project is a DIY wardrobe for my bedroom. - I build an online community for researchers and academics - this gives me purpose beyond my day-to-day academic activities. - Eventually, I talk to people about my proposals to check if there are other options to consider. You're not alone with rejections. Use this community to share success, but also seek support when things aren't going so well. We're all here to help each other!
2 rejections in 2 days...
3 likes • Nov '25
Thank you for sharing this Prof Dawid. Finding our own strategies for dealing with rejection in academia will be important, especially early in our careers when rejections can feel overwhelming and highly discouraging. It means a lot to hear this from someone with your level of experience.
1-10 of 14
Hassan Khaled
3
40points to level up
@hassan-khaled-1677
PhD Candidate | Modelling CO2 removal processes using absorption

Active 6d ago
Joined Oct 23, 2025