Dec '25 • Publishing
Logical flow of information
Most research papers don’t get rejected because of “bad data” – they lose readers because the story doesn’t flow. If a reviewer has to work to reconstruct your logic, you have already lost half the battle.
Logical flow is the skill that turns results into a convincing paper. It’s also 100% learnable.
1. Start with the storyline
Before writing sections, write the story in 3–4 sentences:
- What is the problem or gap?
- What did you do about it?
- What did you find?
- Why does it matter?
If you cannot explain this mini‑story clearly, the paper will struggle to flow. Use this as your guide when deciding what belongs in each section and what is a distraction.
2. Use a simple global structure
A clear macro‑structure automatically creates flow.
A helpful way to think about it is:
- WHY – Why is this problem important? (Introduction)
- HOW – How did you investigate it? (Methods)
- WHAT – What did you find? (Results)
- SO WHAT – What do the findings mean? (Discussion/Conclusion)
Check that each section answers its question and leads naturally into the next. If the reader ever has to “jump” mentally, add a bridge sentence at the end of the previous section.
3. Make paragraphs do one job
Flow collapses when paragraphs try to do too many things at once.
Aim for:
- One paragraph = one clear idea.
- First sentence: topic sentence (what this paragraph is about).
- Middle: evidence, examples, reasoning.
- Last sentence: link forward (how this connects to the next step in the argument).
If you cannot label a paragraph’s main job in 3–4 words (e.g., “gap in methods”, “key result 1”), it is probably overloaded and needs splitting.
4. Build sentence-level bridges
Within paragraphs, flow depends on how sentences connect:
- Start with familiar information (what you just said), then add new information.
- Reuse key terms instead of constantly changing labels.
- Use deliberate signposting phrases:
*“In contrast…”
*“As a result…”
*“Building on this…”
*“Taken together, these results suggest…”
These “micro‑bridges” prevent the text from feeling like a list of disconnected statements.
5. Align everything with the research question
A surprisingly powerful test of logical flow:
- For each section, ask: “Does this bring the reader closer to answering the research question?”
- For each paragraph, ask: “If I delete this, does the main argument become weaker or just shorter?”
Anything that does not move the reader along the main road from question → evidence → conclusion is a detour. Detours are what make papers feel unfocused and hard to follow.
6. Use a “flow check” in revision
After the first full draft:
- Read only the first and last sentence of every paragraph. Does the story still make sense?
- Add one linking sentence at the end of any section where the jump to the next feels abrupt.
- Ask a colleague to explain “what your paper is about” after skimming it. If their version doesn’t match your intended storyline, your flow needs tightening, not more content.
Logical flow is not decoration; it is the backbone of a publishable paper. Treat yourself like an editor: protect your core storyline, prune detours, and add bridges where the reader might stumble.
If you want, share your paper’s 3–4 sentence storyline in the comments. Happy to give feedback on whether the logic is clear and compelling.
9
2 comments
Logical flow of information
powered by
skool.com/research-career-club-8446
Become 'go-to' research expert by delivering novel research; engaging outside academia; and building profile to amplify impact | Created by Prof Hanak
Suggested communities
Powered by