Omg I love these guys! They provide great entertainment and info, I assure ;) Thanks for sharing!!! I think others should stick around to enjoy the escapades of the crappy Roberts.

Actually, I just started the 2nd test, and it suffers from a lack of complexity as well. Maybe I'm overthinking things, but I find the test unsatisfactory. For example, the first question: "If you had to choose, would you rather have a smaller government providing fewer resources or a bigger government providing greater resources." I know it's not meant to be ideal, just a quick, which one am I more strongly attracted to? and I would say that the government is good at providing resources in one domain, and not so good in another. Another "In general, would you say experts who study a subject for many years are… usually better at making policy about that subject than other people, usually worse at making good policy decisions about that subject than other people, or neither better nor worse at making good policy decisions about that subject than other people." I just don't feel like I can honestly answer these. Some of the answers are not obvious or as intuitive to me as I think they are to the test makers.There is so much more going on, for example, an expert in a subject can get tunnel vision, or their decision may depend on securing financial backing, career advancement, peer pressure, etc. which can create a conflict of interest. Obviously, someone who has no expertise in the subject will not have information accessible to them to make a wise decision about policy, but they will be able to tell you on the ground how much it has affected them in other enterprises. I don't want to not answer, but I find the answers to the questions to be a bit more complex than what is on offer. Another, "How much more, if anything, needs to be done to ensure equal rights for all Americans regardless of their racial or ethnic backgrounds?" The answers "A lot, a little, nothing at all." "A lot" of what? Maybe I'm just confused. I think I'd have to go through these tests and give commentary on several of my answers to really shed light on how and what I thought about the genuinely important issues raised. Which I think would be an excellent excuse to look at detailed research and get more informed, and perhaps shed light on how I "feel" about things at a more granular level, but I'm not certain that such an enterprise will reveal my own biases to me, or if it did, that wouldn't exactly be objective. :/ Sorry, and thanks!

Okay but the first test I will definitely argue is absolutely biased @B T I'm sorry I didn't mean to criticize your choices. They're prestigious and done with care no doubt, maybe I'm just being too finicky. You know? I think so, lol. I think I did learn something. That I need a better political education for sure for sure, and that I'm too cynical @B T. :(

Hi, I'm Elin, comin at ya from Upstate New York (mid-Hudson Valley), and I like to learn languages for fun. I love freedom, liberty, democracy and national sovereignty, and love learning about people from other places. It's neat. Hola.