For those running agents on a recurring schedule (daily/overnight), I'm tightening my own setup and curious how you handle two things: 1. Stale or wrong context — how do you stop a scheduled run from acting on yesterday's state or drifting from the current workspace? Cold start every time, a freshness check, something else? 2. Autonomy vs approval — how much do you let a scheduled agent actually do unattended versus leave as a draft for you to approve? Where's your line between "just do it" and "prepare it and wait for me"? Mine currently drafts everything and waits for a human yes, but I suspect I'm leaving easy wins on the table by not letting it act on the safe stuff. Where do you draw the line, and what burned you?

TL;DR How can I build my folder/file system so that it can be accessed and used across devices? I am always on the go, sometimes working from my phone, sometimes my laptop, sometimes my husbands laptop, sometimes my desktop. I'm looking for a central hub to store my files on that will sync across devices. Is anyone already doing this? I've been using Obsidian Sync with a backup to GitHub but since I want to be able to use Jake's ICM system with the third layer of files and artifacts, Obsidian doesn't seem to be working great for that. Is anyone building their whole knowledge base right on GitHub or using a different cloud solution?

You guys keep liking and commenting on my confession posts, so here's another one. I wish at least one of these confessions wasn't real. They're all real (sad face). For the AI nerds in here (so, all of us): I think I'm addicted. It's worse than being hooked on a video game. A game at least has the decency to feel like a waste of time. This feels productive. Sometimes it actually is. At 1am, running six seven sessions at once? Not so much. ------------------------------------ What my nights have turned into ------------------------------------ Multiple Claude sessions going at once. When it got late and I knew I should be in bed, I'd flip every one of them with the /remote-control command so I could keep feeding the machine from my phone. Lying there in the dark. Waiting for the little dot to show up that means it's done thinking. Fire off the next instruction. Wait for the dot again. It's a slot machine. Drop the coins, pull the lever, watch for the dot. Like a freaking addict. One evening this week (I think it was Tuesday) I had three sessions all editing the same end-of-day file, and they kept overwriting each other's work. I'm sitting there getting genuinely angry. Then I caught myself cursing out a piece of software. Out loud. "You BLEEP, you broke it again." And I stopped. It's a machine, Ruben. Why are you getting triggered by a machine? And who's really doing the breaking? ------------------------------------ So I asked the machine why I can't quit the machine ------------------------------------ I did what any self-respecting addict does. I used the thing I'm addicted to, to figure out why I'm addicted to it. I'd read The Goal a while back (the Theory of Constraints novel everybody in operations swears by). I reopened it, had Claude walk me through the main concepts and tie them back to my business. And it clicked: I'm the bottleneck. My time, my attention. Not my team. Not my tools. Me. Then came the part that actually stung. The optimizing itself was the bottleneck. I'd been spending multiple two-hour sessions buffing an end-of-day routine whose entire job is to take fifteen minutes. The thing I kept "improving" stopped being my constraint years ago. I just couldn't put it down.

My son and I have been building a baseball game together in Claude Code. He designed what he wants in a PRD, He drives the build while I watch, and we've gotten pretty far just describing what we want and letting the AI write it. It kinda works, he can kinda play it. But we've hit the limit of vibe-coding our way through it. Here's our problem: we don't actually understand the fundamentals of how a game is put together. So when something's off, we're guessing. We moved one base on the field across many separate sessions because we have no mental model for how this stuff is supposed to be structured.That's just one example of many. We're fighting it instead of building it. We don't want a quick fix. We want to learn the foundation so we stop flailing. What we're asking the community: 1. If you've built a game, what core concepts do we have to understand before anything else? We keep hearing "game loop," "state," "sprites," "collision" but we couldn't explain them to you. Explained to a 10 year old. 2. What's the right way to think about structuring a game so it's not one giant file? Ours is basically one 2,800-line file right now. 3. Best beginner resource you'd actually recommend for someone who learns by building, not by reading docs cover to cover? Course, YouTube, anything. Bonus if it's something a kid and a parent can work through together. 4. For someone using AI to write the code, what do we need to understand ourselves vs. what we can let the AI handle? For context, it's a React app drawing on a web canvas, but we think our gap is conceptual, not language-specific. We made the repo public and there's a full PRD if anyone wants to see what we're going for: - Repo: https://github.com/ruben-aguirre/diamond-scholar - The plan (PRD): https://github.com/ruben-aguirre/diamond-scholar/blob/master/docs/PRD-v2.1.md Not looking for someone to build it for us. We want to understand it well enough to direct it. My son and I are connecting, but now I'm getting frustrated because I can't help him the way I'd like, and the game isn't looking they way he wants it.

Edited: 100+ have voted Results to follow Thank You Please take ten seconds to respond to this poll — it helps everyone see the real meta! I’ll like every comment. BONUS: If I can twist @Jake Van Clief ’s arm, we’ll pick one random commenter for 1 month of premium access — for free once we hit 100+ votes! Vote and reply! Main method you use for interacting with AI agents right now? WHAT"S IN YOUR TOOLBOX RIGHT NOW?