You’re capped at ~100 connection requests per week. So what do most people do? They try to push harder… Send faster… Stretch the limits… And end up getting restricted or flagged. Here’s the reality: You can’t scale LinkedIn with one account. Try to force it… And LinkedIn shuts you down. So what actually works? You stop thinking single account… and start thinking system. The approach we use 👇 Instead of sending from one profile… We use multiple pre-warmed LinkedIn accounts that look like real team members. • proper profile pictures • work history • existing connections • natural activity Everything LinkedIn expects to see. Now instead of: ➡️ 1 account → ~100 requests/week You get: ➡️ 10 accounts → ~900+ requests/week What this actually does You’re not just increasing volume… You’re: • spreading risk across accounts • protecting your main profile • scaling safely without triggering limits The result? We went from: ~10 meetings/week → to ~90 meetings/week Same offer. Same messaging. Just better infrastructure. This is how agencies actually scale LinkedIn outreach without burning accounts. Not hacks. Not shortcuts. Just the right setup. If you want to see exactly how this works and how to set it up properly… Comment “Aimfox” below 👇

I have a Bonus Gift for you when you reach Level 2 in the community: --> 10 Lessons - My Best BUSINESS ADVICE 1. Level Up by Introducing Yourself Below in the comments. 2. Then Like and Comment on someone else's. By LIKING & COMMENTING you will earn points and level up the leaderboard, gaining you access to more Classroom Modules. Leaderboard members can qualify to be invited to Insiders Masterclasses! ⚡️ 𝐀𝐂𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐒𝐓𝐄𝐏⚡️ ☎️ Join the New Members Clarity call every Friday at 4PM EST (this is only for new members) You can find the next one in the calendar Like & Comment on someone else's introduction and make a friend 🤝 🆕 Learn the Skool Platform in the "Get Started" in the Classroom 🚀 Start Learning Lead Gen Secrets with the full Masterclass. ✅ Check off Each Module as you complete them. Questions? Search for them in the Search Bar If you can't find the answer, post your question in the community... Let’s get to work! Lead Gen Jay PS - Review Rules & Community Guidelines Click Here

Let's say you're doing email outbound for clients, and want this to be the most DFY approach possible. You create the copy, the domains, the emails, handle the replies, etc. I'm guessing you gotta source leads for them as well. Do you include this cost into the price of your service usually? And how would you source leads for them?

A lot of people think low reply rates mean they need a better template. So they keep rewriting emails, trying new openers, new CTAs, new angles. People say templates don’t work anymore. TEMPLATES AREN’T THE ENEMY In reality, templates work fine if: - The targeting is tight - The offer makes sense - Deliverability is good - Volume per inbox is low enough You can send the same email to 2,000 people and get great results or send a “perfect” custom email and still get ignored. Relevance beats personalization. TEST WITH ENOUGH DATA Another mistake is judging a campaign too early. Sending 50 emails and getting 1 reply doesn’t mean anything. Sending a few hundred to a few thousand (depending on your setup) gives a much clearer signal. But this doesn’t mean blasting. - Keep volume per inbox low - Ramp slowly - Let the campaign run long enough to see real replies - Then decide what to change. TRACK THE RIGHT METRIC Open rate is unreliable; we discussed this here. Better metrics: - Total reply rate - Positive reply rate - Booked calls You can have a high reply rate but no interest. That usually means the copy creates curiosity but not real value. Positive replies tell you if the offer actually fits the market. That means, offer clarity matters more than clever copy. Good emails usually fall into one of these: Make money Save money Save time If the reader can’t quickly understand what they get, reply rate drops. SIMPLE TESTING CYCLE THAT WORKS - Write a few variations - Send with safe volume - Let the campaign run - Look at replies, not opens - Keep the winner - Test again Cold email improves with data, not guesses. Curious what most people here changed that made the biggest difference. Copy, targeting, or infrastructure?

I am so happy to see the first result! now i can consider scaling that approach! Money is coming soon!!