User
Write something
NOTICE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW AND PEREMPTORY NORM VIOLATIONS
[Your Name and Address]Darren Geneva StreetGeographic area known as St. Catharines, Ontario [Date] TO:Mayor of the City of St. CatharinesCity Hall50 Church StreetSt. Catharines, Ontario NOTICE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW AND PEREMPTORY NORM VIOLATIONS Dear Mayor, I write to place you formally on notice regarding provisions of the Ontario Municipal Act, 2001 that govern the “City of St. Catharines.” I am commencing a judicial review in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice challenging these provisions as void ab initio and of no force or effect, pursuant to: - Section 52 of the Constitution Act, 1982 - Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Peremptory norms of international law (jus cogens), including Articles 1, 7, 8, 15, 16, and 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Core Violations The Municipal Act violates non-derogable rights by: - Incorporating inhabitants of geographic areas into municipal corporations without knowledge or consent (s. 1). - Granting corporate municipalities the rights of a natural person, while subordinating natural persons (s. 2). - Imposing perpetual property taxation, liens, and tax sales on homes that are fully paid (ss. 264–267, 342–351). - Enforcing by-laws that burden freedom of conscience (ss. 8–11, 426–439). - Treating the Mayor and Council as a Board of Directors of a corporation, managing inhabitants as corporate assets. These actions violate: - Article 16 ICCPR – Right to recognition as a person before the law. - Article 18 ICCPR – Freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. - Article 8 ICCPR – Freedom from slavery and servitude. - Article 7 ICCPR – Freedom from cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment. - Article 1 ICCPR – Right to self-determination. Duty After Notice As of receipt of this Notice, you are personally aware that the Municipal Act is under judicial challenge for violating jus cogens norms. Peremptory norms cannot be excused by domestic law. No official may defend violations by claiming to be “just following orders” or “just applying statutes.” Any continued enforcement after notice may expose individual actors — including yourself — to personal liability under international law.
0
0
Whistleblower
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRRYXiDRdtM&pp=ygUcV2hpc3RsZSBibG93ZXIgRWRnYXIgU2NobWlkdA%3D%3D
Hmmmm
Consent to death Consentement à la mort 14 No person is entitled to consent to have death inflicted on them, and such consent does not affect the criminal responsibility of any person who inflicts death on the person who gave consent.
0
0
Criminal Code OF CANADA
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/C-46.pdf
0
0
USC
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/31 (6)Motor vehicle.— The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.
1-24 of 24
Universal Order Of Conscious
skool.com/universal-order-of-conscious
Enforcing inalienable Human Rights, Holding Governments Accountable for Violations against our conscious being. Peremptory law under universal order
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by