๐๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐น๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ, ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฟ๐ผ๐น๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ป๐ฒ๐
๐ ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฝ.
A few months back I had an experienced (2 or so years) student who'd been closing for most of that time take a setter role.
She took it as the role was attached to a company that she felt was A-grade / a long term play for her.
They were only open to starting her as a setter and then - on performance - ascending her to closing.
So she did that, dominated as a setter and soon ascended to closing (where she's doing great!)
And the role is A-grade and a long termer for her so her instincts were right...
Yesterday I spoke with a fellow sales pro and I encouraged him to be open to this approach too.
The role he closes on is fizzling out at the moment and I was able to introduce him to an A-grade industry person who has some setter roles available.
I told him of the student mentioned above an also said "better to align with an A-grade role / person - even at the bottom as a setter - and then quickly ascend over staying closing on a C grade role with little prospects"...
As a closer you should be well versed in setting.
Why?
Well, it builds out your experience and competency.
It allows you to take full stack roles with confidence.
And, it can both be lucrative (there are many setters who can do 8-10K per month) and an entry point into A-grade offers (that wouldn't consider you as a closer).
I worked on a Bizop offer for 2.5 years from 2021 to 2023 and I did both the setting and the closing and it was great!
It gave me a sense of control - keeping it all in-house - and that enabled me to both make more sales and waste way less time (I DQ'd all the unsuitables at the set call level and primed all the suitables for the close call).
It's not a "loss" of ego to set once you've been closing.
It's actually a "gain" when you flesh out your skillset and set yourself up to get into better positions on better offers.