Write something
Pinned
2d •
🎯 The Skill That Doesn't Show Up on the Task List
Most conversations about AI and productivity focus on task speed: how much faster can a draft, a report, a piece of research get done. That's a reasonable place to focus, since task speed is visible and easy to measure. You can time it. You can compare before and after. The gains are concrete. But task speed isn't where the real leverage is anymore, for a specific and important reason. When AI compresses task time across the board, the bottleneck in most workflows moves somewhere task speed can't reach: the speed at which decisions get made about what to do next. Decision speed, not task speed, is quietly becoming the more important variable, and it's not showing up on anyone's task list because it was never a task to begin with. ------------- Context ------------- Think about what a typical AI-assisted workflow actually looks like now. A draft that used to take two hours takes fifteen minutes. Research that used to take an afternoon takes twenty minutes. The execution layer of most knowledge work has compressed dramatically. What hasn't compressed at the same rate is the layer above execution: deciding what to work on, evaluating whether a direction is right, choosing between options, determining when something is good enough to move forward. This layer was always there. Before AI, it was partially hidden inside the execution time. Deciding what a report should argue happened, in part, while writing it. Deciding which research direction to pursue happened, in part, while doing the research. The thinking and the doing were intertwined, and the total time included both. Now that doing has compressed dramatically, the thinking that used to be embedded in it has to happen more explicitly and more separately. And for a lot of people, that thinking hasn't gotten any faster. It's the same deliberative process it always was, but it's now a larger proportion of the total time a piece of work takes, and it's often the part that isn't being tracked or improved at all. ------------- The Bottleneck Moved, and Most People Haven't Noticed -------------
Pinned
4d •
What Success Actually Buys You
Most people think success is about money. It's not. Money is just what buys you options. I've worked hard for decades. Not because I fell in love with the grind, but because I fell in love with what the work could create. Every uncomfortable conversation. Every risk. Every time I wanted to quit but didn't. None of it was just to make more. It was to own my time. To be there for the people I love. To create memories instead of regrets. To have the freedom to say yes to what matters and no to what doesn't. Don't chase success because you want to look successful. Chase it because one day you'll realize time is the only thing you can't earn back. Work hard. Do the uncomfortable things. Become the person capable of creating the life you want. Because real success isn't measured by what you own. It's measured by how fully you get to live. Question for you: If you had complete freedom over your time one year from now, what would you spend more of it doing... and who would you spend it with?
⭐
2d •
🤔 WE WANT YOUR HONEST OPINION!
We want to better understand what people are TRULY trying to accomplish when it comes to AI so we can make our products better. We know it’s broad and there are so many different lanes, but if you had to pick one of the 2 options below, which one would you choose?
Poll
918 members have voted
6h •
A useful design constraint when building your AI stack: can
A useful design constraint when building your AI stack: can one person manage an entire client relationship, including delivery, without burning out? If you answer that honestly, it forces you to think about what agents and automations you actually need. The answer isn't 'build a giant AI operating system.' It's to look at every recurring task you do for a client, reporting, ad copy generation, campaign monitoring, and ask: could I package this into an agent that runs with minimal oversight? Start by picking one time-consuming process you handle for every client. Build a simple knowledge base (client documents, brand voice, recent call notes) and an agent that uses that to produce first drafts. The key is that one person can still steer, review, and talk to the client, but they're not the bottleneck for production. As you get better, you string multiple agents together, always guided by the one-person premise. This way, you don't overbuild. You build exactly what's needed to keep a single operator effective, and if you scale later, you scale that model, not a bloated team structure. What's the task you'd tackle first if you were redesigning your workflow for a one-person team?
27d •
🤖 AI Agents Sound Like the Answer. Here's Why Most People End Up More Overwhelmed.
The promise of AI agents is almost irresistible. Set them up once, point them at your biggest bottlenecks, and watch hours of work disappear. If you've spent any time in AI communities over the last year, you've probably seen the screenshots, inboxes managed automatically, research compiled without lifting a finger, entire workflows running while someone sleeps. What doesn't make it into those screenshots is the setup time, the debugging sessions, the broken handoffs, and the hours spent figuring out why the agent did something unexpected. The promise is real. But the gap between the promise and the reality is where most people quietly lose more time than they save. That gap deserves an honest conversation. ------------- Context ------------- AI agents are genuinely powerful. The concept is straightforward: instead of using AI to assist with individual tasks, you build systems where AI can take sequential actions, make decisions, and complete multi-step workflows with minimal human involvement. Done well, that shift is meaningful. Entire categories of repetitive work can be handed off in ways that weren't possible even eighteen months ago. But there's a pattern emerging that doesn't get discussed enough. Most people who struggle with agents aren't struggling because the technology is bad. They're struggling because they built an agent on top of a workflow they didn't fully understand. The automation made the confusion faster and more expensive, not simpler. Think about what that looks like in practice. A consultant builds an agent to handle their client onboarding sequence. It sends emails, creates folders, populates project templates. Three weeks in, they realize the agent is creating duplicate folders, sending follow-ups to clients who already responded, and occasionally attaching the wrong template. They spend four hours debugging. They rebuild parts of the sequence. They debug again. Two weeks later, the original manual process, the one that took 45 minutes and never had these problems, starts looking pretty good.
1-30 of 19,916
skool.com/the-ai-advantage
Founded by Tony Robbins, Dean Graziosi & Igor Pogany - AI Advantage is your go-to hub to simplify AI and confidently unlock real & repeatable results
Leaderboard (30-day)
1
+543
2
+366
3
+234
4
+177
5
+108
Powered by