User
Write something
Pinned
A Fun Little Exercise...
The team and I did this and some of the results were very interesting! Go into ChatGPT and post this prompt: "Based on all the conversations we've had, can you analyze my behavioural tendencies. Keep it short and concise" Post your response in the comments below and let us know if any of it was a surprise to you! Here is mine: Here are the behavioural tendencies you consistently show in our chats: - Iterative builder: You like shipping a version, then tightening it fast with specific edits and constraints. - Framework-first thinker: You gravitate toward checklists, systems, repeatable steps, and clear structure over vague advice. - High signal standards: You push for longer, fuller answers with real substance, not surface-level answers. - Precision + optimisation bias: Whether it’s macros, pricing, positioning, or scripts, you like measurable targets and tuning variables. - Creative but directed: You enjoy big imaginative swings, but you still want them organized and usable. - Action orientation: You regularly steer toward “what do I do next” and practical outputs you can deploy immediately.
A Fun Little Exercise...
Pinned
⏳ The Hidden Cost of “Almost Clear” Requirements, and How AI Shrinks Rework Cycles
Most teams do not lose time because they move slowly, they lose time because they move forward without alignment. “Almost clear” requirements feel like speed, but they quietly inflate cycle time by creating rework, decision churn, and a constant drip of clarifying conversations that arrive too late. If we want real time back, we stop treating requirements as paperwork and start treating them as a time strategy. AI becomes powerful when we use it to turn vague intent into usable clarity early, so we stop rebuilding the same work in different versions. ------------- Context: Where Requirements Become a Time Leak ------------- In most organizations, the requirement stage is where time either gets protected or gets mortgaged. When we skip the hard thinking upfront, we do not eliminate work, we just push it downstream where it is more expensive. We see this in everyday micro-scenarios. A manager asks for “a quick overview deck” for leadership. Someone creates slides, adds charts, writes copy, and shares it. The feedback is not “this is wrong,” it is “this is not quite what I meant.” Now we are not just revising slides, we are revisiting the definition of the request. The work becomes a discovery process that should have happened before production. Another common pattern is the “invisible stakeholder.” We think the request is between two people, but the output is actually meant for five audiences with different needs. The moment that stakeholder appears, the work shifts. The assumptions that were harmless in a narrow context become costly in a broader one. More revisions appear, and the cycle time stretches. Then there is the “requirements teleport.” The brief says one thing, but the review conversation references a different goal, or a different constraint, or a new deadline. Everyone is still trying to be helpful, but the target is moving. That movement is time loss in disguise because it creates churn without accountability. What makes this so painful is that rework does not arrive as a single event. It arrives as repeated touches. We revisit the same doc, the same deck, the same plan, each time paying a context switching tax. It is not the minutes of editing that hurt, it is the hours lost to mental reload and coordination.
⏳ The Hidden Cost of “Almost Clear” Requirements, and How AI Shrinks Rework Cycles
Pinned
The Difference Between Grinding… and Living on Purpose
I was up at 4:35am this morning… on a Sunday… diving head first into work. And the truth is — it didn’t feel like grinding at all. Because when you love what you’re building, when you know it’s stretching you as a man, when it’s tied to being in service to your family and making a real impact… the work hits different. It stops feeling like pressure. It starts feeling like purpose. I don’t get excited about being busy. I get excited about growing. About becoming more disciplined. More focused. More capable than I was yesterday. That’s what fuels me. Not the hours. Not the grind. The progress. So if you’re in a season where you’re putting in the reps — don’t just ask yourself how hard you’re working. Ask yourself who the work is helping you become. Because when the mission is bigger than you…even a 4:35am Sunday start feels like a privilege.
TAXES 2025, INVOICE
Hello @AI Advantage Team, I was just wondering if it can be possible to receive a receipt for the amount I paid for the AI Advantage course, please. I sent an email to support, but I haven't heard back. I would like to include it with my taxes please. Thanks
🚨Recraft V4 — Nano Banana Pro Killer or Just Different?
Recraft V4 just released and it’s one of the strongest image models we’ve seen recently. The realism is already extremely high, but what really stands out is the visual taste — images come out looking naturally designed rather than over-generated. It’s getting attention fast because it handles: - realistic people and environments - strong composition without heavy prompt tuning - ad creatives and brand visuals - fashion and editorial-style imagery A lot of creators are already testing it for marketing visuals, social content, and campaign-style images where realism and aesthetic direction both matter. Too early to say where this lands long-term, but this is serious competition in the image generation space https://www.recraft.ai/blog/introducing-recraft-v4-design-taste-meets-image-generation
🚨Recraft V4 — Nano Banana Pro Killer or Just Different?
1-30 of 11,478
The AI Advantage
skool.com/the-ai-advantage
Founded by Tony Robbins, Dean Graziosi & Igor Pogany - AI Advantage is your go-to hub to simplify AI and confidently unlock real & repeatable results
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by