Quick note before the analysis 👇 This post is written exactly how I normally post inside the paid Trading Desk. I wanted to share a sample so you can see how I think about location, context, and risk ________________________________________________________________________________________________ HTF CONTEXT: NFLX is pulling back into a major demand zone (85.44–95.14) that was the origin of the impulsive move that led to the recent ATH. From a structure perspective, this zone matters because it represents where strong buyers previously stepped in and displaced price. Price is now back inside that demand — this is location, not a signal. TRADER VIEW (Swing / Position) From a trading standpoint, this is an area of interest, not an automatic entry. - The demand zone is valid, but price still needs to show acceptance or strength. - I’m looking for further development (structure, momentum shift, or confirmation) before considering a long. - If demand holds and price starts building higher structure, this sets up a high-quality long from value, not from ATHs. Patience here is key. No chasing. INVESTOR VIEW (Long-Term / Fundamentals) If you’re a long-term investor focused on the business: - Buying near ATHs offers poor risk/reward, even for great companies. - A ~30% discount from ATH provides far better asymmetry for long-term positioning. - This pullback into demand aligns much better with capital preservation + upside potential. BOTTOM LINE - Trader: Watch how price behaves inside demand before acting. - Investor: This is a far more attractive zone to build exposure than at ATH. Plan first. React to price. No chasing.

HTF Context: SPX500 is reacting from higher-timeframe supply, with sellers defending the upper range. The recent rejection suggests downside risk remains elevated while price stays below this supply area. Structurally, the path of least resistance favors lower prices unless buyers regain control.

HTF CONTEXT:PLTR is trading below a higher-timeframe supply area that caused a clear break of structure to the downside. Price has retraced back into this supply and is showing early seller response, suggesting distribution rather than accumulation. There is no valid HTF demand with clear cause-and-effect below current price, which limits upside and keeps downside risk elevated. Want the exact entries/exits, stops, and risk plan for this setup—plus live alerts?Get today’s full plan inside The Trading Desk. Join before the bell to access the full setups.Tap here to get in now → https://www.skool.com/the-trading-desk-2388/about?ref=85ece149906849f6825500a492585d6d

HTF Context: Before analyzing LULU, it’s important to define the lens. From a long-term perspective, price is trading significantly below prior highs, which changes the risk profile compared to buying near ATHs. From a market structure standpoint, price has already reacted from a major higher-timeframe demand area, which has slowed downside momentum. That reaction suggests buyers are present, but overall structure remains messy, keeping this more in the category of a location-based opportunity rather than a clean trend continuation. Until structure improves, this remains a patience setup rather than an aggressive conviction trade.

HTF Context:TSLA is currently trading inside a major higher-timeframe supply zone, which continues to cap upside. Until this supply is broken, higher prices remain structurally limited. Below current price sits a large price imbalance around 358–383, representing unfilled inefficient price action that could attract price if supply holds. A bullish case only opens if price breaks and holds above the HTF supply (488.54). Until then, this remains a decision area rather than a breakout environment.