AI vs IA — Why You're Fighting the Wrong Battle

Let me ask you something uncomfortable.

When you sit down to produce content for a client, who are you in that moment? Are you a strategic marketing partner building something that matters? Or are you a person trying to get a number below 35%?

Because those are two very different people. And only one of them is going to build a business worth having.

I've been watching this AI detection obsession spread through the industry and I need to call it what it is. It's fear. Dressed up as quality control, but it's fear. Fear that Google is going to "catch" you. Fear that the content isn't "real" enough. Fear that you're doing something wrong by using the most powerful tool that's ever landed in your lap.

So you run the output through a detector. It says 78% AI. Your stomach drops. You start tweaking words. Swapping sentences around. Fighting with Claude like you're negotiating with a hostage taker. And thirty minutes later you've got something that scores 34% AI and reads like it was written by a committee that hated each other.

Sound familiar?

Here's what nobody in this industry wants to say out loud.

Google does not have an AI detector running on your content.

They don't care if AI was involved. They never said they did. What they care about, what they have ALWAYS cared about, is whether the content is any good. Is it helpful? Is it accurate? Does it serve the human who searched for it? That's the game. Same game it's been since Panda. Since Hummingbird. Since the helpful content update. Quality wins. Garbage loses. The tool you used to create it is irrelevant.

So let me give you a different frame.

Stop thinking AI — Artificial Intelligence. Something separate from you. Something you need to hide.

Start thinking IA — Intelligence Augmentation. Something that amplifies YOU.

That shift isn't just semantics. It changes your entire relationship to the work.

When you operate as IA, YOU are the expert. YOU are the mind. YOU are the one with 5, 10, 20 years of marketing knowledge, or your client is the one with decades of expertise in their trade. The AI didn't wake up one morning with opinions about roofing or hair restoration or personal injury law. The human did. The AI helps that human get what they know onto the page in a way that serves their customer.

A carpenter doesn't apologize for using a nail gun. Nobody inspects a house and asks "was this framed by hand?" They ask one thing. Is it solid?

Same question. Is the content solid?

The real problem isn't AI. It's the absence of an editorial process.

If you dump a topic into an LLM, take whatever comes back, and publish it — yeah, that's going to be garbage. Not because AI wrote it. Because nobody showed up as the expert. Nobody directed it. Nobody injected a point of view or checked whether it actually helps the customer or just fills space.

But here's what changes everything.

When you build a style guide that captures the client's real voice. When you feed the AI proper research and context so it has something meaningful to work with. When you direct the output toward narrative, entity-rich answers written from the business owner's actual perspective. When you review it like a professional and ask "would my client be proud to put their name on this?"

What you end up with is excellent content that was produced efficiently by a human expert using modern tools. That's IA. That's the standard.

And here's where you separate yourself from everyone else.

Add an Editorial Guidelines page to your client's site. Right next to Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Utility page. Simple. On it, you state openly that AI tools are part of the content production workflow, and that all content is directed, reviewed, and approved by the human expert behind the business.

You're not hiding. You're owning it.

You know what that signals to Google? Exactly what E-E-A-T is looking for. Experience. Expertise. Authority. A real person with real knowledge standing behind every word on that site. The AI is the tool. The human is the authority.

That's not a weakness. That's a competitive advantage most people are too scared to claim.

So here's my challenge to you.

Next time you produce content, don't run it through a detector. Read it out loud. Ask yourself three questions:

Does it sound like something the business owner would actually say to a customer standing in their shop?

Would they be proud to have this on their site?

Does it genuinely help the person reading it?

If yes — publish it. You're done.

If no — don't blame the AI. Look at your editorial process. That's where the real work lives.

Stop fighting detectors. Start building a process that produces content worth reading. Use AI as IA. Be transparent about it. Put it on the record with your Editorial Guidelines page.

And most importantly — stop apologizing for using the best tools available to serve your clients at the highest level.

That's not something to hide. That's something to lead with.

1 comment