The idea that Dementia Don will deploy U.S. military resources to aid Iran is hopeful at best. I believe that maneuvering forces in the area is only posturing, designed to serve Trump's covert agenda of distracting from his failed domestic policies and personal scandals—such as the Epstein Files. Trump is as corrupt as he is souless. He shows open contempt for NATO. He has no love for the Iranian people.

In this discussion, we break down the rapidly escalating situation in the Middle East and the potential for a comprehensive war involving the United States, Israel, and the Islamic Republic. We start by analyzing breaking reports that Iraq’s Hezbollah brigades are preparing for “martyrdom operations” and mobilizing to back Iran, signaling that the regime expects an imminent attack. We take a deep dive into the betting markets (Polymarket), which show a significant jump in the odds of a US strike on Iran by the end of February. But is the White House aligned? We discuss the reported divide among Donald Trump’s advisors: while JD Vance argues that the President’s "red lines" must mean something, Jared Kushner and Steve Whitcoff are reportedly opposed to an attack, potentially due to business ties with Gulf nations that prefer stability. We also analyze Trump’s shifting psychology—moving away from seeking a Nobel Peace Prize and towards cementing a legacy of strength, even if that means war. The conversation shifts to the strategy on the ground. If the US and Israel do not intervene directly, what is "Plan B" for the Iranian revolution? We debate the logistics of arming the population. While smuggling weapons is difficult due to border security, Armin argues that a more effective strategy involves US airstrikes targeting the security perimeters of the regime’s own weapon warehouses, allowing the people to raid them. We discuss the risks of unarmed civilians facing the IRGC and why the regime's "demographic engineering"—attempting to replace rebellious Iranians with loyalists from neighboring countries—is a sign of their desperation. Finally, we look at the geopolitical chessboard. Will China intervene to save the Mullahs? The consensus is that while Beijing enjoys cheap oil, they view the Islamic Republic as a "dying horse" and will likely restrict their support to posturing rather than direct military involvement. Topics covered in this video: - Hezbollah brigades mobilizing to support the Islamic Republic. - Polymarket odds: The increasing likelihood of a US strike by Feb 28th. - The Trump Cabinet Split: JD Vance (Pro-Strike) vs. Kushner (Anti-Strike). - Trump’s "Unchained" Ego: Why he no longer cares about the Peace Prize. - US Military Power vs. Political Capital: Why democracy slows down war. - Arming the Revolution: Smuggling vs. Raiding domestic armories. - China’s Calculus: Why they won’t fight a war for Iran. - Regime Tactics: The shocking plan to grant residency to foreigners for temporary marriages. - Armin’s interview with Israel’s Channel 12.

They could have gotten some help from me shielding these Kurdish 'nationalists' against the supranational farm-animal-molesters that are dogpiling their stream, but when they in in this demonstration as well host multiple speakers of the supranational Communists (aka "Red"),,, The same supranationals who these "iso-Kurds" (courtesy by Shauna) had just a few days ago joined in passionately condemning any form of US/Israel intervention for the liberation of Iran,,, yeah, I'm 100% going to remind them that they can't then be expecting intervention on their behalf either. Translation of my comment: "You had a demonstration just a few days ago against the US/Israel intervening for the Iranian people, why on earth would they, or anyone else, do that for you?" On the following screentshot, is just the myriads of comments to underscore my over-arching point to the Iso-Kurds: "You're bedfellows with the enemy, you've made your bed, and now you're sleeping in it." Link to full stream (it's pretty much only in Norwegian and Kurdish, but still, here it is); https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxRx-hqOuqc

When Iran is Free it's allies in the neighbourhood area will be mainly Israel as the Iran-Israel alliance will make them be the closest of allies ever and other allies will include Armenia, Georgia, Cyprus, Tajikistan and India Other countries in the area however will be problematic to establish any positive bonds with because those countries have Islamic nature to them instead Iran will only establish a neutral relationship with them as said by Shāh Reza Pahlavi and his transition team this neutral relationship will only exist with those Islamic countries so far as they don't threaten Iran's national interests or threaten any of Iran's allies (i.e. Israel, Armenia, Georgia, Crypus, India and Tajikistan) otherwise Iran will be justified in fighting problematic Islamic countries like Qatar, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan and even Turkey if they keep insist on pushing their nonsense Pan-Turk agenda on Iran or harm Israel, Armenia and Cyprus in any way