Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Liberty Politics Discussion

3.4k members • Free

2 contributions to Liberty Politics Discussion
Movement And Not Alone
Based on current reports for today, Tuesday, January 20, 2026, there is significant activity regarding U.S. aircraft carriers operating with their transponders off or in "stealth" modes. Current Carrier Status & Transponder Activity - USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72): The Lincoln Strike Group is currently the most active. After leaving the South China Sea, it was tracked entering the Strait of Malacca late Sunday. As of today, reports indicate it has likely disabled its public AIS (Automatic Identification System) transponders to maintain operational security while transiting toward the Middle East (CENTCOM area). - USS Nimitz (CVN-68): There have been specific reports that the Nimitz also ceased transmitting location data to maintain route secrecy while heading toward the Persian Gulf. - FAA Warnings: The FAA recently issued a 60-day flight caution (effective Jan 16 – March 17, 2026) for the Eastern Pacific and Latin America. This advisory explicitly warns civilian pilots that military aircraft and vessels in these regions may be operating without active transponders, significantly reducing situational awareness for civilian air traffic. - Recent Context - This activity follows a reported military buildup in the Middle East, including the redeployment of F-15E Strike Eagles from the UK to Jordan and the movement of heavy strategic bombers to Diego Garcia. The disabling of transponders is a clear indicator of a transition from "routine transit" to "combat-ready" status. - As of today, Tuesday, January 20, 2026, there is a significant surge in airpower, missile defense, and logistical support moving into the theater. 1. Major Airpower Surge While the carriers provide mobile airbases, land-based aircraft are moving to forward positions to decrease response times: - F-15E Strike Eagles: At least 35 F-15E Strike Eagles from the 48th Fighter Wing (RAF Lakenheath, UK) have arrived at Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan. These aircraft are equipped with the new EPAWSS electronic warfare suite, designed to penetrate advanced air defenses. - Aerial Refueling Bridge: A "massive" relocation of KC-135 Stratotankers and KC-46 Pegasuses is underway. This creates a "gasoline alley" over the Mediterranean and Red Sea, allowing long-range bombers (like B-52s or B-2s) to strike from the U.S. or Diego Garcia without landing. - Cargo & Logistics: Open-source flight trackers have identified over a dozen C-17 Globemaster III and C-5 Galaxy transport flights heading into Qatar (Al Udeid) and Jordan over the last 48 hours, likely carrying munitions and ground support equipment.
0
0
Chemical Weapons
I just caught the end of Armin’s discussion with a major in the live stream on chemical weapons. I thought I’d post some pertinent definitions contained in the convention because it can be confusing. A “chemical weapon” can be anything from pepper spray many women carry in their purses to sarin gas, it depends on when and how it is used. Here is a link to the convention: https://www.opcw.org/sites/default/files/documents/CWC/CWC_en.pdf
Chemical Weapons
2 likes • 1d
Look into Pharmaceutical-based agents (PBAs) and you will know what they are most likely spraying in the case of delayed lethality. They have deployed other forms before (against a bunch of girls) and been testing all differant types of PBA's for years. These fentanyl etc. etc. concoctions is cheap for them from their strategic partner CCP.
0 likes • 1d
@Heidi Wall I get that and completely understand clarification that there is various chemicals from mild to death... but they was referring to the people that was deliberatly killed from what they was spraying. PBA's explains the delayed lethality that everyone is seemingly confused by. Nobody but the BRICS nations would rule this as a permissible use of a chemical weapon.... upon unarmed citizens. As far as "inadvertent deaths" the two cases mentioned (Iran-Russia) are not even comparable. But I'll reply to that since mentioned. Because of said "grey area" that allowed Russia to get away with the deployment in that case (though not the deaths- they lost the case), the rules changed in December 2021. The rule change specifically used Russia as a example for the change. Of course Russia, China, and Iran argued that the state should determine LE usage rather than a international body making this determination. The court unanimously found Russia guilty of violating Article 2 (Right to Life) of the European Convention on Human Rights on two grounds which is why they had to dish out $1.7 million to the 64 survivors and family members who brought the case. In the case of Iran: It's been "illegal" since December 2021 which the Islamic regime certainly knows considering they argued against said change. Now I personally disagree "international law" is even being a thing (in general) but if we are going to use it than yes it's deployment is illegal under such. Personal view (outside of law): The use in Iran isn't inadvertent deaths period because they first don't have a legitimate reason to deploy on unarmed civilians and secondly they have any intention of deploying any antidote (if there even is any - don't know the exact concoction used yet).
1-2 of 2
Red Logan
1
3points to level up
@red-logan-9262
Red

Active 2h ago
Joined Jan 19, 2026
Powered by