24d • General
Hermeneutics
Interpreting the Bible is always a controversy. I’m curious what sort of frameworks you guys read scripture in light of. To give an example, most evangelical sermons will emphasize the reader response aspect, “what does this mean to me” and it often restricts the fullness of scripture. Even Christocentric models can do the same. It seems that there are these basic aspects of authorial intent, textual meaning, original audience intepretation, christological fulfillment, typological interpretation, allegorical intepretation, and reader response. How do we rank these different aspects of interpreting scripture in order to have the “loveliest” explanation of scripture?
2
1 comment
Hermeneutics
Leaderboard (30-day)
1
+9
2
+4
3
+4
4
+3
5
+3
Powered by