Verifying GSD plan patterns against Context7 docs - overkill or smart automation?
Quick question for the experienced folks here. I'm brand new to claude code and GSD, used cursor and n8n a bunch 12 months ago, built a little business and then shut it down. I'm using GSD workflow and built a post-planning hook that verifies implementation patterns in my plans against Context7 documentation before execution. What it does: After /gsd:plan-phase completes, it extracts patterns from the PLAN.md files (install commands, config setups, import statements, API usage) and checks each one against current Context7 docs. Example check: - Plan says: ConvexProvider wraps BrowserRouter - Context7 query: "Is this still the correct provider hierarchy?" - Result: ✅ Current or ⚠️ Pattern changed Why I built it: I'm new to this and paranoid about executing plans with outdated patterns. The planner agent might be using stale knowledge, and I'd rather catch API changes before running code. My concern: Am I creating unnecessary overhead? Is this actually useful, or am I solving a problem that doesn't exist? More experienced users - do you verify plans before execution, or do you just trust the planner and fix issues as they come up?