...the human's control surface and the model's orchestration logic.
Per Jake's article, this effectively means that:
-As the chosen agent, Claude would read the files, and be the orchestrating agent, per my setup in the files
-Claude would then execute using sub-agents, AGAIN, per my setup in the files
-Would this in fact also mean that I can technically drill down to the most minute of details, & have Claude execute my setup, to the letter?
And so, as the human in the loop, I'm directly responsible for directing any probabilistic AI, to create my vision per the scripted setup in the files, & by this same understanding, am consequently directly responsible for every sub-agents' success as well?
i.e. Claude is my co-worker (haha pun intended). Yet in every instance, I am, the deterministic orchestrator.
Yes/ no?