I've gone to my music on their music channel and looked. I've noticed that they have not labeled any of my music as AI even though I've clearly labeled that I wrote the lyrics and the music was created by AI on Distrokid. I label all my videos that I personally make as AI on my channel. Has anyone else noticed this?

There are some things about prompting with claude you must know so that your songs at a baseline are acceptable that I did not learn for awhile. First off make a skill that you can load up for all your models. In the skill tell Claude to 1. Make sure there are no ad lib/random item/instrument chants in the songs. 2. Make sure words are not repeated too often as you will find these LLMs are notorious for putting the same words at a baseline. Those are the 2 things that you definitely need to have in all your song LLM prompts and I would put whatever you want in all your songs in the skill as well such as punctual (clear) voices, possible making songs polished studio recording sounding, and melodic math (and maybe varied song structures). Anything else people can think of comment in this thread (but dont overly bloat the prompts)

Hey everyone, Since everyone here is already well aware of the current YouTube Music upload issues, I’ll skip the background details and get straight to my dilemma. My first album (distributed via DistroKid) was uploaded over a week ago. It’s live everywhere else, but completely missing on YouTube Music, and a recent resubmission didn't help. My main question is: Should I wait for this album to finally drop on YouTube Music before putting out my next single/album, or go ahead and release anyway? @Jesse Hull , I'm especially curious to hear your take on this—what do you think is the best move in this situation? Would love to hear everyone's recommendations. Thanks!

I am confused about all the different accounts creation/ claiming. I createda an youtube channel for my first artist, a tiktok and Instagram account. Do I need to create a spotify account? What do you guys mean by claiming your spotify artist and youtube channel? Am I missing a step of the process?

An AI singing photo generator turns one still image into a video of that face performing a song. You upload a photo, you upload audio, and the model maps phonemes to mouth shapes, adds blinks and head movement, and returns a finished clip. The reason this format keeps spreading is simple. It needs no camera, no filming, no editing skill and no face of your own. One image and one audio file is the entire input. The tools are not equal though, and the gap is wider than the marketing suggests. Most of them are talking head generators with a music upload bolted on, which is a different problem. Speech has pauses. Singing has sustained vowels, held notes and fast lyric runs, and that is exactly where the cheap ones fall apart. I put the same five images through all of them. HOW I TESTED Five source images, because the failure modes only show up when you leave the easy case: A clean studio portrait. A grainy family photo from the 1960s. An illustrated cartoon character. A dog. A classical painting. Same 30 second vocal for all of them. I scored four things: sync on hard consonants, whether the face survives long held notes, whether non human subjects work at all, and export quality. Here is where each landed. 1. ZOICE The only tool that cleared all five images without a failure. The cartoon, the dog and the painting all produced usable performances, which is where most of this category simply gives up and returns a warped face. Sync held through the sustained notes rather than drifting the jaw, and it stayed locked across the full clip instead of degrading after the first few seconds. Output runs to 4K, and the photo to video path is very easy. Best for: anyone working outside clean portraits, and anyone producing at volume who needs the same quality every time rather than one good result in five. Watch for: test at 720p before committing a batch, then push the keeper to full resolution. 2. HEYGEN The most polished product here and very safe on a well lit front facing portrait. It also handles pets and illustrated characters. The 1960s photo is where it slipped, with the grain and soft focus turning the mouth region mushy.