Just Compared Veo 3.1 vs Sora 2 - Here's What I Found + FREE Deep-Research Report

Hey everyone!

Got early access to Veo 3.1 on Higgsfield and decided to put it head-to-head with Sora 2. Did a full comparison video testing the same prompts across both platforms.

Some quick takeaways:

- Veo 3.1's audio quality is noticeably cleaner (almost studio-grade)

- Sora 2 does longer generations (12 seconds vs 8 seconds)

- Veo 3.1 works better with image-to-video when you use a starting frame

- Both have their strengths depending on what you're creating

I tested everything from fitness videos to anime scenes to product commercials. Also included a bunch of community-generated clips that show what's really possible with Veo 3.1.

Full breakdown in video below or here: https://youtu.be/LC23Q3iw3ZM?si=ORHJiVXgr3843-ys

Worth noting - Higgsfield has unlimited generations right now on Sora 2 / WAN 2.5 and almost all of their image models (such as NanoBannana and Seedream 4.0), which is huge for anyone doing production work or iterating on ideas.

BONUS: I'm also giving away a comprehensive deep-research report I put together on Veo 3.1 - covers all its capabilities, technical specs, and detailed comparisons against the competition. Its available if you visit the video on YouTube

Curious what you all think. Anyone else testing these tools? What's your experience been?

2 comments