@Jackie Fletcher I don't know much about your niche so I took the prompt at face value that you gave, and this is the Highest ranked contact I came back from looking at just a couple of Youtube videos. But this skill is easily available for free through my community, I can also get you set up with it by itself if you're not ready to get the whole cluade code experience going! 1. The literal list, nothing else Evidence. Loudest pattern in the whole set, and it shows up two ways. Direct: "Why can't someone just say what to eat and not eat? Carbs, fats, good fats, bad fats, fibers..means nothing to me. Tell me as a Diabetic..eat these. Some of these, and none of these." (476 likes). And "On the left of the board you have a detailed list of things you shouldn't eat, but no detailed list of things you can eat." (497). Sideways, and stronger: on both Ken Berry videos the top non-testimonial comments are viewers rewriting the video as a plain list for each other — 2,600 likes on chapter markers, 2,500 on a numbered summary, 2,300 on a GOOD/BAD food split, 883 on someone writing that same list out again. The audience is doing packaging work the creators left undone and thousands are upvoting it. Post: one screen. Eat this / sometimes this / not this. No mechanism, no macros. Hook:"Yourentirefirstweek,ononepage." 2. Two doctors, opposite advice, and how to settle it yourself Evidence. "So other doctors say oatmeal is good and other doctors say steak is bad... who do you believe?" · "Dr Mandell says oatmeal is an ideal food for diabetics....sooo.....who is right!?" · "I was told bacon was SUPER bad for you... ARe you sure?" · "The NHS advocates AGAINST low carb diets" · 519 likes: "For years we heard these foods were bad." Post: don't pick a side, teach the test. Glucose reading at baseline, 60, 120 minutes. Serious Keto's rice experiment is that idea in action and his audience loved the method more than the answer. Hook:"Two experts, opposite advice. Here's the 90-second test that tells you which oneisrightforyou."