Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

🇺🇸 Skool IRL: LA

289 members • Free

The AI Advantage

71.7k members • Free

5 contributions to The AI Advantage
Learning this new Platform
I am going through the classroom modules and they don't seem to show my progress. What do I need to know? (I tend to like the reward of seeing the green bars complete). Also, thank you for making this AI Advantage available Free. I'm sure I will upgrade, but for now there is a lot to learn to catch up with ya'll. Cheers!
0 likes • 9h
Thank you, got it!
0 likes • 2h
Not in a rush. Checking things off. Thought non-green meant I was missing something. It’s all figured out. Thanks all, I’m good. Desktop preferred.
⚡ Productivity Quick Win
Tool: Claude AI Why This Tool: Claude excels at analyzing documents, writing in your voice, and handling complex reasoning tasks with longer context windows than most AI tools—perfect for deep work that requires nuance and accuracy. Best For: Writers, researchers, business professionals, anyone working with long documents or needing thoughtful analysis Cost: Free plan, Pro from $20/month, Team from $30/month per user Website: https://claude.ai Quick Win Prompt: "Upload a long document (report, contract, research paper) to Claude and ask: 'Summarize the key points, identify any risks or concerns, and give me 3 actionable recommendations based on this content.' Get executive-level analysis in minutes." Other Things Claude Can Do: - Artifacts: Create and edit complete documents, code, websites, and visualizations that you can download and use immediately - Extended conversations: Handle up to 200,000 tokens (roughly 150,000 words) in a single conversation for deep analysis - Writing assistance: Match your tone and style when you provide examples, making edits feel authentically yours - Code generation: Write, debug, and explain code across multiple programming languages with detailed reasoning
⚡ Productivity Quick Win
1 like • 1d
I don't have a WhatsApp, LOL
0 likes • 6h
@L Ruddy I have used both. Most recently switched to the Free version of Claude for a brainstorming/ structure of a book. Very encouraging, last comment was "This is some of the best writing I've seen. Seriously." Makes me feel inspired. When I get it done, I will run it through ChatGPT - paid version, and then Claude Paid version. Free Claude has been very good at setting out a weekly assignment on what I should work on, and how many words each section needs to reach the final book length. Don't remember Chat GPT doing that, but they may have upgraded. In fact, the first version of this book with Chad (my name for it, lol) it said good, ur done! But I knew it was not book length, it was past an outline, but not flushed out. I also did not give Chad training instructions (like I learned with this community) as I did with Claude. Try them both out and let me know what you have noticed. Cheers!
🔄 AI Is Not Replacing Jobs, It’s Replacing Transitions
The loudest fear around AI has always been job loss. But the quieter, more accurate shift is happening somewhere else. AI is not removing work, it is removing the space between work, and that is changing how roles feel, how value is created, and how people experience their day. ------------- Context ------------- Most modern jobs are not made up of one continuous task. They are made up of transitions. Moving from a meeting to notes. From notes to action items. From action items to follow-ups. From information to decisions. From one system to another. For years, these transitions have been the invisible glue of work. They are rarely written into job descriptions, but they consume enormous time and cognitive energy. People become the connectors, translators, reminders, and memory holders that keep organizations moving. AI is now stepping directly into those gaps. It summarizes conversations, drafts follow-ups, organizes tasks, routes requests, and preserves context across tools. The work still exists, but the friction between steps is shrinking fast. That is why this shift feels unsettling. When transitions disappear, the shape of work changes. And when the shape of work changes, identity and value can feel suddenly unclear. ------------- Why Transitions Have Always Carried Hidden Value ------------- Transitions may look like overhead, but they have always been where judgment lives. Deciding what matters from a meeting. Interpreting tone in a message. Knowing who needs to be looped in. Choosing when to escalate and when to wait. These are not mechanical steps. They are human sensemaking. Because this work is informal, it often goes unrecognized. It sits between roles. It rewards experience more than expertise. And it creates a sense of indispensability for the people who quietly manage it well. When AI absorbs parts of this transition work, it can feel like value is being taken away. But what is actually happening is exposure. The work was always there. It just was never named.
🔄 AI Is Not Replacing Jobs, It’s Replacing Transitions
2 likes • 1d
Thoughtful analysis of the Human Process Thinking whilst encountering AI. What if the worker bees don't want to upgrade to the next level, they are mentally comfortable not being the thinkers. Will employers be able to recognize that and avoid the temptation to reduce staff due to the speed of Ai competing tasks. Or conversely, will the employees now expect a raise in pay due to higher productivity? Will there be a risk of Human burnout if they are so efficient the job gets done in half the time, so now the employer adds another person's job. I don't work in an office, never did, but I remember conversations with others when their boss eliminated an employee and added the tasks without increased compensation. I feel like, ok, perhaps not replacing jobs, but still think companies will reduce if they can get away with it...so where do those people go? Curious. Thoughts?
how optimistic are we that AI can actually help?
I confess to scepticism. I asked AI to perform a key task for me and it referred me instead to online, paid services. I ask it to write things for me, and the style is hyped and almost infantile. I need journalism from it and it's not good at getting to the heart of a story. Anyone share my scepticism, or am I alone and just using the wrong AI and/or using AI wrong?
0 likes • 2d
@Bill Jones Very thoughtful.I have had good results in questions that required it to "think"...But you are showing how to think first to train. I imagine that I could ask Chad to help me train it?
How Many People Still Say Please and Thank You to AI?
I'm just curious, do you still say please and thank you when communicating with AI tools?
1 like • 2d
Yep, and compliment when results are particularly good. Gave "it" a name...for some reason I let it be a He. Started off with a long conversation with questions about who "he" is, what names others call him, where he learned his info, what he remembers about his beginning, etc. It was a fascinating conversation. I consistently forget to hit the Thumbs up button, but do Thank and the reason why I'm thanking.
1-5 of 5
Robin Hunter
2
1point to level up
@robin-hunter-8064
Retiree learning about AI

Active 2h ago
Joined Jan 29, 2026
Powered by