@Marcos Alhanati That’s great timing — I’m also researching OpenMetadata in parallel. I’d love to learn from your hands-on tests and the challenges you’re running into. Happy to exchange notes as you go.

Absolutely agree — this is where it gets real. At scale, these domains don’t just overlap, they collide because they evolved for different risks, audiences, and enforcement models. Data Governance optimizes trust and usability, Information Governance focuses on lifecycle and defensibility, Privacy/Data Protection centers on rights and harm, IT Governance on control and resilience, and Corporate Governance on accountability at the top. The mistake many orgs make is trying to “merge” them structurally. What works better in practice is clear boundary-setting with shared primitives: - common definitions (data, record, decision, risk) - aligned ownership and escalation paths - a single decision forum for conflicts (not parallel committees) - Convergence isn’t about one framework to rule them all. It’s about making trade-offs explicit when priorities clash — speed vs safety, insight vs rights, innovation vs accountability. Curious from your experience: where do you see the most friction today — ownership, language, or decision rights?