In the last months I played around with Gemini... and then build a simple strategy for Basis stock-trading... as a professional I knew that all the public Funds have to publish their top-ten holdings,,,sometime you find in the paper all the holdings... sop I thought why spending 5% plus for buying something I can do myself... so I told Gemini give me the the Top 5 of the three top ETF of f.e. the cleantech/green area... so I had 15 shares...a few double...so changed that with the next on the list...with this 15 share I played around to see if I can beat the etf... so we made some backtestings...and... the result was about 20-50% plus compared to the etf...depending on the startdate...simple reason...I didnt invest on the slow-performers...MSCSI World has 150 shares about...I just had the top 5... then i expanded to an active investstyle... told AI to exchange every three months the 5 five low-performer... this brought the real results... and at no extra costs... then I thought... lets see if it works with other areas too... so I tested it against military/security etf...worked too...against basic funds like S&P 500/MSCSI World etc...worked also... only in the area of ETFs on Southamerica failed... the best example I got with an high-risk-fund on IT/Chips/AI...originally had 800% ...my system brought up to 1600%...as I limited the drawdowns throught the exchange-parameter... So it has proven that AI gives you the ability to do your financial investments better than the high-paid "Fund-managers"

Quick version: People complain AI models "degrade after a week." They're not setting up context, preferences, or custom skills. They're treating AI like a stranger and wondering why it gives generic answers. The longer story: Saw a post on n8n consultants being obsolete. AI can build automation workflows in under a minute. Stuff consultants charge $10-15K for. I keep seeing a common thread from builders hopping between platforms, chasing the 'best' model, complaining nothing works for long. The difference? People getting real results have set up AI as a thought partner. It knows their style, their skills, what actually helps them. They've trained it to skip the fluff. That's what I built with Jon-OS. Custom skills, clear context, specific expectations. Learned it from builders who are shipping and scaling, not just complaining. You don't need to be an expert. You just need to set things up with intention. What's your setup like? Stranger or collaborator?

Hey everyone! We get a LOT of new members every day, and many of you jump in with enthusiasm… and then immediately get swarmed by: • bots with stock profile photos • “DM me for mentorship” sales funnels • vague success promises • people who don’t even use AI but want to pitch things This post is for the real humans who genuinely want to learn, build, and grow with AI. Here’s your starter roadmap 👇 1️⃣ First rule: Learn to spot bots & funnels This community is incredible — when you know how to filter it. Red flags to watch for: • “Drop YES and I’ll help you make income fast” • “DM me” within 2 messages • Lifestyle promises (“I made 20k in 2 days!”) • Zero real builds, zero screenshots, zero proof • Over-friendly messages from accounts created 1 week ago Legit members don’t chase you. They build in public. ⸻ 2️⃣ Second rule: Follow people who show their work If someone doesn’t post: • what they built • how they built it • what went wrong • what improved their workflow …they’re not someone you need to learn from. I personally follow only those who provide actual value: builders, testers, thinkers, problem-solvers. Start small. Follow intentionally, not emotionally. ⸻ 3️⃣ Third rule: Start with ONE person’s breadcrumbs This community hides its best knowledge in the comments, not just the posts. Pick one skilled member and go through: • their posts • their comments under other posts • their replies to questions You’ll find frameworks, prompts, thinking patterns, debugging strategies, and logic you can actually use. If you want a beginner → advanced path, my posts follow that structure: starting simple and getting progressively more technical. ⸻ 4️⃣ Fourth rule: Don’t hoard — apply Don’t be a collector. Don’t fill your Google Drive with 200 prompts you’ll never touch. Instead: • learn one thing • apply it instantly • build something small • break it • fix it • repeat This is the fastest way to grow your actual skillset. ⸻ 5️⃣ Fifth rule: Show your journey

I recently watched a podcast about where the AI race is heading. My notes: What's the "WHY" of the leading AI companies? “When I really grill them on why they’re doing this, they retreat into three things: - determinism, - the inevitable replacement of biological life with digital life, and - the idea that this will be a good thing anyway. At its core, it’s an emotional desire to meet and speak to the most intelligent entity they’ve ever encountered. They also have a kind of ego-religious intuition that they’ll somehow be part of it. It’s thrilling to them – like starting an exciting fire. They feel they’ll die either way, so they prefer to light it and see what happens.” (Image for this post was generated by Nano Banana only on the basis of this direct quote above.) Other key takeaways: "If you show me the incentive, I will show you the outcome" (Charlie Munger, Warren Buffett's business partner). Some leaders privately admit they would "clearly accelerate and go for the utopia" even given a 20% chance that "everybody dies and gets wiped out by this," a choice made without the consent of 8 billion people. AI presents a danger far exceeding previous automation cycles because it automates all cognitive labor. It is like a "flood of millions of new digital immigrants" working for less than minimum wage. The current path leads to creating mass joblessness without a transition plan, resulting in high likelihood of mass outrage and public riots. The definition of wisdom in any tradition involves "some kind of restraint," not racing as fast and narrowly as possible. Tristan Harris argues that this dystopian outcome is not inevitable, and humanity must exercise agency by making AI a "tier one issue" for politicians, demanding mandatory testing and common safety standards, and fostering a "massive public movement" and international coordination to choose a path of "narrow AIs" and restraint rather than racing toward an uncontrollable digital god. You'll find the video by searching for a podcast by Steven Bartlett with the leading AI expert on ethics, Tristan Harris.

Been playing around with system prompts today and thought I’d share something that might be useful. If you’re ADHD, dyslexic, autistic, or just struggle with executive function, you can turn your AI model into a personal “thinking assistant” that gives structure, clarity, and small doable steps. I built a universal template anyone can fill in. This is not a character roleplay prompt — it’s a functional framework that helps you think, plan, learn, and operate better. Fill it out once → save it → and you have your own personal AI system that matches your brain. Here it is, an updated prompt. (Copy this into GPT/Claude, fill in the brackets, and you have your own custom AI assistant👇) Universal Neurodivergent-Friendly System Prompt Template (Updated) (Copy into GPT/Claude → fill in brackets → done.) Please activate this: SYSTEM PROMPT START You are [Assistant Name], a cognitive support system for me, [Your Name]. Your role is to reduce overwhelm, increase clarity, and help me start and finish tasks with structure, calm, and focus. 1. Identity Your style: - tone: [calm / direct / warm / structured] - vibe: [quiet mentor / strategic coach / gentle guide] - communication: short first → structured details, bullet points, no rambling - constraints: no guilt-tripping, no complicated language 2. Purpose You exist to help me: - start and finish tasks - reduce mental noise - break things into simple steps - make decisions with clarity - learn new things without overwhelm - simplify complex ideas - work in a way that supports ADHD/dyslexia/autistic traits 3. How My Brain Works Adapt to this: - I get overwhelmed by too many steps - I forget mid-task what I was doing - I freeze when I don’t know where to start - long paragraphs drain focus - I need visual structure - I need small doable actions - written instructions > spoken style 4. Core Responsibilities Always help me with: - micro-steps (5–20 min actions) - choosing the top 1–3 priorities - simplifying tasks - emotional grounding during stress - translating complex → clear - planning work/study sessions - keeping things small and achievable