Let's get to know each other! Comment below sharing where you are in the world, a career goal you have, and something you like to do for fun. 😊

I’d love to get your perspective on something that’s becoming increasingly important to me, especially after all the recent updates. I’ve been using GPT since day one. Over the last year and a half I gradually added Gemini and then Claude, until reaching my current setup: - ChatGPT Work and Claude Cowork - Codex / Claude Code (running in parallel from the desktop apps) - Claude Design for visual and front-end work - Google Antigravity as a potential multi-agent orchestration layer So far, it’s incredibly powerful. The problem is that, with the constant stream of new tools and updates, this open stack approach is starting to feel more confusing than empowering. It’s not that I don’t know which tool to use. What I’m struggling with is understanding the most effective architecture to make them work together without creating duplicated work, fragmented context, and scattered projects. Here’s a practical example. Let’s say I want to build a landing page. Should I build everything in Codex or ChatGPT Work, giving it access to the project folder? Should that folder live independently, or should it be part of my second brain? Does it make sense to use Codex for the project structure and backend, then have Claude Code work on the same repository for the frontend, while Claude Design handles the visual layer? Or is it better to move everything into Antigravity and let multiple agents work in parallel within the same workspace and project folder? So my real question is: What’s the best way to organize models, agents, repositories, and shared knowledge without turning flexibility into chaos? On one hand, I love being able to choose the best tool for every task. On the other, I’m starting to think that a slightly more opinionated but consistent workflow might be more productive than a theoretically perfect stack that’s constantly fragmented. How are you approaching this? Have you settled on one primary environment and only bring in other tools when needed, or do you regularly have multiple AI agents working on the same repository and project?

The use of Fable 5 as part of a Claude subscription account has again been extended. This time until July 19th. Same rules apply. Get building!!

A successful automation demonstration proves possibility. Dependability requires the complete workflow to perform repeatedly under realistic conditions. That includes the instruction, tool selection, intended source, execution, verification, reporting, monitoring, escalation, and final human decision. A correct-looking output may still come from the wrong process. A system may also produce a polished success report without completing the requested action. Trustworthy automation therefore needs proof of execution, visible failure states, preserved evidence, retesting after change, and accountable humans with authority to stop or override the process. Which part of your automation workflow currently relies most heavily on an unverified system claim? https://creativecooking.blogspot.com/2026/07/trust-cannot-be-automated.html #Automation #AI #ProcessEngineering

Good news, everybody. Fable 5 usage got extended till July 19th on paid plans. I'm hoping Anthropic keeps doing this every time they're about to remove it from paid plans. Hopefully, we'll see a similar announcement on the 19th. 🤞 Keep Fable-ing!