Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Dissertation Demystified

24 members • Free

2 contributions to Dissertation Demystified
Some Insights on Dissertation "Compliance"
Greetings everyone, A quick reflection (and perhaps rant) based on a chat @James Watkins and I just had regarding his problem statement. Todd wrote an excellent problem statement that unpacks a multilayered issue in non-profits: Boards of Directors often hire based on perceived leadership qualities, but the actual leadership competencies needed to secure an NPO’s financial sustainability are often lacking. He submitted it to his chair, and the feedback made no mention of the argument he built, the nature of the research gap, or how effectively he problematized the issue. Instead, the feedback focused entirely on template compliance—too long, too complex, not aligned with the required structure. This experience is common in many non-traditional doctoral programs. The dissertation process can feel heavily templated, and true scholarly thinking often gets overshadowed by canned language and conformism. That's frustrating because everyone in here is passionate about their research and bring a wealth of knowledge and experience on their topics. This is exactly why Dissertation Demystified exists! Our goal is to help you navigate these program requirements without sacrificing the rigor or integrity of your research. You can meet the template and still produce meaningful, high-quality doctoral work. We’re here to help you balance both, every step of the way. @Trina Richardson-Sledge I know you’ve had similar experiences at Walden, with your chair simply saying “follow the MEAL plan” without any substantive guidance. And many other members will likely encounter similarly frustrating or discouraging interactions. Note: I’m not bashing Liberty, Walden, or dissertation chairs (most are well-meaning scholars who themselves are required to advise within the framework given to them). But it does give food for thought about how the doctoral education space sometimes needs to be held to a higher standard. And together, we will do just that!
2 likes • Nov '25
Great convo! Let me see if I can add an "insider" perspective to this as I work at a university in my day job. A lot of universities, especially for-profit ones, are hyper-focused on retention because that is a factor in rankings and accreditation, and PhD programs are notorious for losing students. It makes sense when you think about it: the work is incredibly demanding, most of us were never really taught how to operate with that level of independence in undergrad or even in a master’s program, and many doctoral students are adults juggling jobs, families, and real-life responsibilities. Because of all that, a lot of programs respond by creating these super-structured, prescriptive pathways. They definitely make the process feel more manageable and accessible, but they also take away some of the freedom and agency that are supposed to be part of becoming a scholar. So if you’re feeling like you have to squeeze yourself into the program instead of the program supporting who you are as a learner—I get it. Honestly, I think that reaction shows you’re approaching this like a real scholar: with curiosity, with questions, and with a healthy dose of critique. That’s not a weakness; that’s part of what makes doctoral-level thinking so valuable! Keep sitting in the frustration, you'll be the better for it! 😀
👋 Hello!
Hi everyone, I’m Nadia Ibrahim-Taney, and I’m really excited to be part of this community! A little about me: I just started a PhD in Education Studies with a concentration in Action Research, which is all about using reflection and evidence-based problem-solving to complete research, which for me, focuses on improve teaching, learning, and student experiences. In other words, I love finding practical ways to make education more effective and meaningful for everyone. As an Assistant Professor currently, I teach courses that help students connect what they’re learning in class to real-world experiences like co-ops, internships, and future careers. I’m especially passionate about creating inclusive learning environments, particularly for neurodivergent and international students. Outside of work, I love to travel, cook, and spend time at the theater! Having done one of my master’s in London, England I try to get to the West End as often as I can, which living in America, isn’t too often. I’m really looking forward to getting to know folks! If you ever just want to chat about things, feel free to send me an email at nadia@beyonddiscoverycoaching.com (which is my private coaching practice email).😀
2 likes • Nov '25
@James Watkins what fun! I did not even know this was a thing!
2 likes • Nov '25
@James Watkins Love this! I am sure we will lots to converse over re: theater and beyond!
1-2 of 2
Nadia Ibrahim-Taney
2
11points to level up
@nadia-ibrahim-taney-1407
University Professor by day, PhD in Education and Action Research student by night

Active 53d ago
Joined Nov 11, 2025
ESTJ
Cincinnati, OH
Powered by