Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

AI Marketing by Kia

21.5k members • $1/month

Automation Masters

3.8k members • Free

AI Automation Agency Hub

312.3k members • Free

AI Automation Mastery

28.3k members • Free

GHL Growth Garage

906 members • Free

OS Architect

11k members • Free

GHL Accelerator

433 members • Free

GHL Blueprint

1.6k members • Free

HighLevel Quest

13.9k members • Free

37 contributions to AI Automation Society
3 Big Myths About GoHighLevel (That Hold People Back)”
Let’s talk about the biggest misunderstandings I hear about GoHighLevel and why they’re completely false. MYTH #1: “GoHighLevel is too complicated.” Truth: It only feels complicated if you try to build everything at once.Start with ONE workflow, ONE pipeline, or ONE funnel and suddenly it all clicks.The platform is powerful, not complicated. MYTH #2: “Automation makes your business less personal.” Truth: Automation doesn’t replace you, it supports you.The right automations actually make your customer experience MORE personal because nothing gets forgotten.A timely message is a personal message. MYTH #3: “You need to be ‘techy’ to use GoHighLevel.” Truth: You need curiosity, not coding.The drag-and-drop builder and ready-made templates do most of the heavy lifting.If you can follow steps, you can build systems. Here’s the real deal:Most people don’t struggle with GoHighLevel… they struggle with overthinking. Keep it simple. Build one thing at a time.And watch your workflow become a system… and your system become freedom. Which myth did YOU believe at first?
0 likes • Nov '25
@Modoulamin Sanyang Hi
Build High Quality Lead List for Cold Email...
Two weeks before, I had a conversation with one founder who later became our client. He sounded tired. Frustrated. He told me he’d sent thousands of cold emails and barely got any replies.1%, maybe 2%. He thought the problem was his copy. So, he kept rewriting it, changing subject lines, personalizing harder. Nothing worked. When we looked closer, the problem wasn’t the copy. It was the list. He was emailing random people who were never even in the market for what he sold. So we rebuilt it from scratch, focused only on companies that were hiring, raising, or scaling. Same copy. Same domain. Reply rate jumped from 1% to 8%. We followed Three Approaches to Building High converting Lead List and I just wanted to share this with you guys as lots of people will be needing this as well... Approach #1: Past Client Analysis (The Highest ROI Method) The people who already trusted and paid you. When you study who they are, what triggered them to buy, and what patterns connect them, you uncover gold. You start seeing the real signals behind why people convert. Approach #2: Signal-Based Targeting (High Intent, Scalable) This is signal-based targeting where you reach out to companies showing buying intent right now. Maybe they’re hiring, just raised funding, or brought in new leadership. These signals tell you exactly when they’re ready for your solution so you can reach out at the perfect time. Approach #3: Proven ICP Targeting (Casting a Wider Net Strategically) Scaling your outreach using data-backed insights about which types of companies always convert best, even when they’re not actively buying yet. My Brother has explained on this in Detail and thought of sharing with all of you guys... If you find this helpful, Please support him by liking the video and subscribing his channel...
1 like • Nov '25
@Samyog Dhital Spot on. Most founders obsess over copy when the real bottleneck is list quality. Tightening targeting from “anyone who might reply” to “companies with real buying signals” is exactly how you turn cold outreach from noise into conversations. The 1% → 8% jump makes perfect sense, intent beats clever writing every time. Strong breakdown of the three approaches.
Simple Systems = $Revenue
The “unsexy” AI I built last week outperformed every fancy agent workflow I’ve ever tried. Everyone talks about the cool stuff. Nobody talks about the boring system that actually prints money. I just finished a lead qualification system for a sales team. It saves them 20+ hours a week. And honestly? There’s nothing “AI-sexy” about it. No fine-tuned models. No agents arguing. No magic. Just: strict logic prompt-based triage reliable enrichment clean routing automation That’s it. Here’s the real workflow: Lead → enrich → check ICP → score using deterministic rules → push to CRM → auto-route → instant follow-up → sales notified of HOT leads. Nothing fancy. But it works every single time. The wild part? A simple 5-minute follow-up window (Hormozi’s point) moved conversions by 301%. Not the AI. The timing. This project reminded me of something most AI builders ignore: AI = uncertainty. Systems = certainty. Businesses pay for the second. Most of the agent demos you see online? Great for YouTube views. Terrible for ops. They impress founders. They break during campaigns. What actually moves the needle? strict qualification rules deterministic scoring clean enrichment workflows that never break mid-week outputs your sales team can totally trust The stuff nobody posts on socials because it’s not flashy. But that “boring” layer? That’s the foundation that turns an AI demo into revenue. Sexy AI impresses. Unsexy systems scale. As I keep doing work, one pattern is becoming clearer: The AI that changes the business is the one nobody notices— because it just quietly removes friction every single day. No hallucinations. No “maybe the prompt changed again.” No babysitting. Just predictable, boring wins. Curious— What’s the most boring automation in your stack that ended up being more valuable than any “AI agent”? (P.S.- The n8n workflow in the screenshot isn’t fancy. I just add sticky notes so anyone can understand it in 30 seconds.)
Simple Systems = $Revenue
2 likes • Nov '25
This is the truth most AI builders don’t want to admit. The real leverage isn’t in flashy agents, it’s in deterministic logic, clean data flow, and workflows that never collapse under load. Your framework nails the fundamentals: enrichment → qualification → routing → rapid follow-up. It’s boring, repeatable, and revenue-producing. The best systems are the ones nobody notices because they never break.
Automated Follow-up System GNR 3K$ !!!!!!
Hi all—follow-ups have always been a pain, and I know I’m not the only one struggling with them. Last week, I figured out a simple Automated Follow-up System that’s been a game-changer. Here’s how I set it up: 1. Capture leads in [CRM/tool]. 2. Connect to [email/SMS automation]. 3. Build a follow-up sequence with reminders, offers, or tips. 4. Let it run automatically and watch it work. The best part? I’ve been selling these systems to real estate agents, small e-commerce stores, and coaching businesses, and it’s bringing in $2,000+ extra revenue per month per client — without me lifting a finger every day. If you want me to break down exactly how to set it up, just ask 🙏
Automated Follow-up System GNR 3K$ !!!!!!
1 like • Nov '25
@Khaled Sid mhamed This is solid. Most people underestimate how much revenue slips through the cracks simply because no structured follow-up exists. What you’ve built hits the three pillars that actually move the needle: consistent outreach, contextual value, and automation that removes human error. What stands out most is the versatility, real estate, e-commerce, coaching… any business with inbound leads benefits from a well-built nurture sequence. And the fact that you’re turning it into a recurring monthly service is exactly how automation should be leveraged: one setup, ongoing ROI. If you’re open to it, I’d love to see the exact workflow you’re using, especially how you segment leads to tailor the follow-up messaging. That’s usually the difference between “automation” and “conversion automation.”
Looking for an ai specialist
My name is Lucas, I focus mostly on social media automation but I just had a call with a property management company who is struggling to get leads. The issue is that they focus on a very specific county within their state, so I am worried that my typical services wont be as effective. I explained this to them, and they are open to anyway I can help. I am not only looking for someone who can build but also look at this situation with me and figure out what the best automation is. Since I have never worked with a property management company before, I am offering this to them at no charge, but I am looking at putting in an agreement on a commission basis after we define what exactly we will be implementing. They said they have 20 properties under management and are looking to get to 100. If you are interest dm me.
1 like • Nov '25
@Lucas Olsen You’re handling this exactly right. Property management lead gen is hyper-local, so your concern about typical social automation is valid but that’s also the opportunity. Instead of forcing a channel, focus on building a predictable, localized lead-capture and follow-up system around the county they serve. For PM companies, the bottleneck is usually speed and consistency, not volume. I’d look at automations like: - Local owner-lead filtering (identify landlords in that county automatically) - Inbound lead qualification workflows (so every inquiry is followed up instantly) - Property-owner nurturing sequences (convert curious owners into management clients) - Automated “rent-ready” reports or calculators (valuable lead magnets for landlords) Your commission-based structure makes total sense: define the system, implement it free, then get compensated as it drives them toward 100 doors. If you want someone to think this through with you, strategy plus build, DM me. I can help map the funnel, choose the right automations, and ensure what you build actually works for a localized PM market.
1-10 of 37
Miles Taylor
4
83points to level up
@miles-taylor-8207
Powered by curiosity and late-night thoughts

Active 151d ago
Joined Jul 21, 2025
Powered by