Scrolling LinkedIn jobs. Saw: "Hiring Data Entry Clerk - Process 100 shipping manifests weekly." I didn't apply. I messaged the hiring manager: "What if those manifests processed themselves?" THE SITUATION: Small logistics company. Posted job 3 weeks ago. No good candidates. Needed someone to manually extract data from BOLs and manifests into their TMS system. Annual cost if they hired: $32,000 salary plus benefits. My message: "I can automate manifest processing. Gmail receives documents, extracts all data automatically, posts to your TMS. Want to see a 10-minute demo?" Reply came 4 hours later: "Very interested. Can we talk tomorrow?" THE DEMO: Screen share. Opened n8n. Built workflow live: Gmail trigger → Parse Document → Extract structured data (shipper, consignee, BOL number, weights, destinations) → HTTP Request to their TMS API Showed it processing 3 real manifests. Data appeared in their system. Build time during call: 35 minutes. They watched the whole thing. THE CLOSE: "This would save us the hiring process, training time, and $32K annually. What do you charge?" My quote: $1,600 setup + $100 monthly maintenance. They signed same day. THE LESSON: Job postings aren't just jobs. They're automation opportunities. "Hiring data entry" means "doing manual document processing." That's literally what automation solves. WHERE TO LOOK: LinkedIn: Search "data entry" + "hiring" in your city Indeed: Filter for admin/data entry roles Company career pages: Look at their open positions WHAT TO SAY: Don't: "I'm an automation expert looking for work" Do: "Saw your posting for [job title]. What if [their manual task] happened automatically?" THE WORKFLOW I BUILT: Gmail → PDF Vector Parse Document → Extract Structured with schema → Format data → HTTP to TMS → Archive email Template pattern in n8n Build time: 6 hours total (including testing and refinements) Their savings: $32K annually My fee: $1,600 one-time