Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Agency Scaling Secrets (ASS)

2.4k members • Free

AI Agency OS by ColdIQ

1.3k members • Free

Brendan's AI Community

24k members • Free

AI Automation (A-Z)

151.7k members • Free

AI Outbound Academy

2.4k members • Free

AI Agency Owners W/ Sayed

1.8k members • Free

Offbound.fr

2k members • Free

Business Builders Club

7.8k members • Free

ScaledMail - B2B Cold Email

366 members • Free

4 contributions to ScaledMail - B2B Cold Email
Is this an ESP matching issue or a deliverability issue?
I purchased Google inboxes from Zapmail — they handled all the setup and connections. I let them warm up for a full month to be safe. When I started using them in campaigns last week, I got zero replies. I dug into my lead list and realized most of my prospects are on Microsoft providers, which makes sense since I'm targeting enterprise. I came back to the ScaledMail course and figured I should run a deliverability check. Here are the results: https://spamchecker.mailreach.co/tests/7b8a1b8a3e1ecf18778e02 What I can't wrap my head around is how inboxes set up by specialists, warmed for a month, can perform this badly on a spam test. I've only been sending for four days and under 20 emails per inbox — I couldn't have tanked the reputation that quickly. Could I? Since we paid a significant amount for these inboxes, I wanted to isolate the variable and test by ESP. So I ran the same copy through Google ESPs instead — and that campaign pulled a 2% reply rate (All negative). I've attached a copy example if you're curious. And on the targeting front: the first campaign (zero replies) was hyper-targeted. We scraped LinkedIn job postings and even sent physical postcards to those leads beforehand, so targeting isn't the issue. Where I'm stuck: I can't pinpoint whether this is a Zapmail setup problem, something I did, or purely an ESP matching issue — but I need to find a way forward. Has anyone run into something similar? Happy to answer any questions about the setup.
Is this an ESP matching issue or a deliverability issue?
Doesn’t look like an ESP matching issue tbh If it was just Google → Microsoft mismatch, you’d still see some replies or at least decent placement — not zero across the board + poor spam test results This feels more like:• inboxes not actually building reputation despite “warmup”• warmup not functioning properly (seen this with some providers)• or underlying infra issues (routing / authentication / hidden limits) Especially since you got 2% replies (even negative) from another setup — that usually rules out targeting I’d double check if those inboxes were actually sending + receiving warmup emails or just marked as “active”
Stagger Emails
Do you guys stagger your emails from a company level? Let's say you are trying to reach out to 3 prospects in Company ABC. Do you all stagger via: - Day 1 -> Email #1 to Prospect J - Day 3 -> Email #1 to Prospect K - Day 5 -> Email #1 to Prospect L
2 likes • Mar 7
Yes — staggering works better. Sending to multiple people in the same company at once can look coordinated. Spacing them out feels more natural and improves reply quality in my experience.
Need course access ScaledMail users?
Does anyone need access to the course that's already a scaledmail customer? reply below.
0 likes • Feb 25
Can I have it please?
Testing & Replacing Domains
I'm curious on how do you diagnose if a domain is an issue when sending campaigns? Like when is it a sign to rotate and replace domains. Build a scalable system with buffer: Many domains + many inboxes + low volume per inbox, plus 20–30% extra capacity so you can rotate, test, and replace domains without stalling campaigns.
1 like • Feb 25
For me, it’s usually not one metric but a pattern shift — sudden drop in replies + lower inbox placement + increasing soft bounces while copy and targeting stay the same. If I see consistent underperformance across multiple inboxes on the same domain (while others are fine), that’s when I start isolating and testing. Having that 20–30% buffer you mentioned is key — rotation should feel planned, not reactive.
1-4 of 4
Md.Mozahid Hasan Munna
2
15points to level up
@mdmozahid-hasan-munna-5268
I am specialize in high-quality B2B lead generation, cold email outreach, and sales automation to help businesses grow.

Active 5h ago
Joined Feb 25, 2026
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Powered by