Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

InnerDevelopment@Work

492 members • Free

40 contributions to InnerDevelopment@Work
Repository of IDG Research papers
https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=1rQ7vNYAAAAJ&hl=en&authuser=5
1 like • 8d
"To Have or to Be? is a 1976 book by psychoanalyst Erich Fromm, in which he differentiates between having and being. It was originally published in the World Perspectives book series edited by Ruth Nanda Anshen for Harper & Row publishing firm. Fromm writes that modern society has become materialistic and prefers "having" to "being". He mentions the great promise of unlimited happiness, freedom, material abundance, and domination of nature. These hopes reached their highs when the industrial age began. One could feel that there would be unlimited production and hence unlimited consumption. Human beings aspired to be Gods of earth, but this wasn’t really the case. The great promise failed due to the unachievable aims of life, i.e. maximum pleasure and fulfillment of every desire (radical hedonism), and the egotism, selfishness and greed of people. In the industrial age, the development of this economic system was no longer determined by the question of what is good for man, but rather of what is good for the growth of the system. So, the economic system of society served people in such a way in which only their personal interests were intended to impart. The people having unlimited needs and desires like the Roman emperors, the English and French noblemen were the people who got the most out of it. Society nowadays has completely deviated from its actual path. The materialistic nature of people of "having" has been more developed than "being". Modern industrialization has made great promises, but all these promises are developed to fulfill their interests and increase their possessions. In every mode of life, people should ponder more on the "being" nature and not towards the "having" nature. This is the truth which people deny and thus people of the modern world have completely lost their inner selves. The point of being is more important as everyone is mortal, and thus having of possessions will become useless after their death, because the possessions which are transferred to the life after death, will be what the person actually was inside."
1 like • 8d
- Erich Fromm 1976 interview with the BBC on To Have or to Be?
Reclaiming Human Agency
Just coming out of this session on navigating AI, Social Fracture, and Polarization it was SO dense and we were deep into reclaiming our capacity to sense, know, and act amid forces designed to fragment our attention and polarize our communities. This session brought together ethical AI innovators with Tristan Harris, Nepun Mehta, experts in embodiment Manis Srivastava and collective sense-making, and practitioners navigating the economies of attention. Hosted by Otto Scharmer and Antoinette Klatzky and social artist Kelvy Bird. I'll need some time to share my notes! Please, I invite any of you who attended to add your own takeaways from any of the speakers that would be fabulous for us all to read. In the meantime, here is the graphic recording that Kelvy put together. I'm still listening to this phrase from Nepun: Love is deep data, with it we trust that inner coherence will lead to social coherence.💖
Reclaiming Human Agency
5 likes • 16d
Dear Nadine, I trust it may be fine to add some links for reference for those of us who could not be there today. - Web page: Presencing Series 2026 | Leading from the emerging future - .... - Web page: https://www.presencing.org/ - Video: Leading from the emerging future, with Otto Scharmer | Do Better Talks https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqB4eTezJ2A .......... ♡ ..........
What news sources are you reading that you would recommend?
I’ve been an avid reader of Le Courrier International for a long time as it takes news from global sources and publishes them in French. This morning reading about global politics I discover UNHEARD and am quite surprised and pleased with their work. Please share your recommendations on news worthy sources as we need to read and hear unbiased (if that still exists) coverage. Thank you 🙏
What news sources are you reading that you would recommend?
0 likes • 21d
Dear Nadine and Sarah, I hope you please add the 'url' for these two news sources so that those with computer may access them without a mobile app. Gratefully, Katarina
What is community to you?
Most communities don’t fail because of content. They fail because of how people feel inside them. And this is where psychology come in. Not in a weird way. In a very practical way. Because every community creates a kind of “state” in people. 👉 Some feel safe to share 👉 Some just observe 👉 Some feel pressure 👉 Some disappear And that’s not random. It’s influenced by things like: – The way we write our posts – The expectations we set (or don’t set) – How we respond to people – How clear the structure is Small things… big impact. For example: If everything feels “too perfect” → people hold back If everything feels chaotic → people get lost If nobody leads → nobody moves What I’ve learned: People engage when it feels easy and safe enough. People engage around topics of interest People engage to share I’m curious: Have you thought about what community feels like for you?
What is community to you?
5 likes • 29d
Community for me is when each person has a chance to contribute including an option to pass and speak at a later time. Sometimes we can speak during a gathering and sometimes in response to a post like this one. Frequent PAUSES can allow for INTEGRATION and REFLECTION so we form a SENSE OF THE WHOLE community, every voice spoken or written. .............. ♡ ..............
4 likes • 29d
@Anand Chaturvedi "value alignment first before anything else: sounds to me a beautiful SPRINGBOARD that naturally leads to and DEVELOPS both RESPECT and TRUST. Thank you. ............. ♡ ..............
Skill Builder Discernment Round 2 - March 10th 6pm CET
Hello Community 👋 This Tuesday we had such a great conversation in the Skill Builder - around the topic of discernment - that we thought we'd run it again and make it available to other people from different time zones (12pm ET) to join us. One of the questions we'll be discussing is this: How do I discern what I believe to be true? In a world saturated with information, opinions, urgency, and noise, discernment is no longer optional. It is a core leadership capacity. But what does discernment actually mean? Is it rational analysis? Is it intuition? Is it alignment with values? Is it collective sense-making? We'd love for you to join us next Tuesday! And tomorrow, Thursday March 5th , @Nadene Canning is hosting the 2nd Facilitation & Design Incubator! This session will walk you through a real case of the facilitation process from client scoping to integration. If you can't make the call, don't worry the recording will be accessible in the classroom for Premium members. Until very soon Sarah & Nadene
Skill Builder Discernment Round 2 - March 10th 6pm CET
1 like • Mar 5
Please remind us how to enrol in the classroom for Premium members ♡.
1 like • Mar 5
Thank you for the link once again.
1-10 of 40
Katarina Halm
5
336points to level up
@katarina-halm-8828
https://www.academia.edu/122168437/Wind_at_my_back_Katarina_Halm

Active 7d ago
Joined Oct 13, 2024
Powered by