When did one bad moment make YOU forget the 99 good ones?
A long, clean streak can distort risk. One bad outcome gets more weight than the many that went fine. The base rate stays the same. If you already possess a stack of evidence about something, or undeniable proof (as Hormozi would say), you have enough data points to outweigh the "what ifs". Portable Life sees this all the time: - One missed flight vs dozens that connected - One sketchy stay vs years of solid homes - One slow Wi-Fi day vs months of stable work - One lost bag vs a long run of clean arrivals Keep perspective with simple moves: - State the base rate: out of 100, how many went fine? - Name the expected costs: delays, fees, scrapes - Improve the process, not the identity: add guardrails and continue - Track outcomes: count wins and issues, not moods - Add one safeguard: backups for power, data, routes, or stays What past scare made YOU overestimate the risk, and what guardrail did YOU keep?