@Travis Sago â quick question on auction-style offers. Iâve studied your framework closely and Iâm planning to test it publicly on my own profile. Context: I sell a high-ticket, done-for-you email growth system.Not templates. Full implementation. It includes: âą Deliverability repair + list revival (getting open rates back to 20%+) âą Strategic sequencing (custom multi-sequence architecture) âą Conversion mechanism + messaging alignment âą Framing the leads so they arrive at the call pre-sold and context-aware âą CTA integrity so the right people book and show up When the ecosystem is built correctly, this has produced up to ~$300K in revenue from a single high-ticket offer. I normally sell it for $30K because itâs real execution work and long-term involvement. Hereâs my dilemma. With an auction-style model, how do you structure it so you donât end up in a situation where the top bid is $2K⊠and now youâre committed to delivering something that normally commands $30K? This isnât information. Itâs implementation. My SOPs. My time. My calendar. My current thought is to break the system into performance-based sprints: Start with a tightly scoped sprint (deliverability + revival + first revenue sequence), and then let higher bids unlock deeper access, more sequences, and broader ecosystem optimization. So the auction determines the level of execution and access. How would you structure guardrails for a high-touch DFY offer so the upside remains exciting, but the downside doesnât wreck unit economics? Would love your take.