Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

CC Strategic AI

915 members • Free

GET SHIT DONE

358 members • Free

Tech Snack University

17.3k members • Free

The Agentic Lab

1.4k members • Free

5 contributions to GET SHIT DONE
Verifying GSD plan patterns against Context7 docs - overkill or smart automation?
Quick question for the experienced folks here. I'm brand new to claude code and GSD, used cursor and n8n a bunch 12 months ago, built a little business and then shut it down. I'm using GSD workflow and built a post-planning hook that verifies implementation patterns in my plans against Context7 documentation before execution. What it does: After /gsd:plan-phase completes, it extracts patterns from the PLAN.md files (install commands, config setups, import statements, API usage) and checks each one against current Context7 docs. Example check: - Plan says: ConvexProvider wraps BrowserRouter - Context7 query: "Is this still the correct provider hierarchy?" - Result: ✅ Current or ⚠️ Pattern changed Why I built it: I'm new to this and paranoid about executing plans with outdated patterns. The planner agent might be using stale knowledge, and I'd rather catch API changes before running code. My concern: Am I creating unnecessary overhead? Is this actually useful, or am I solving a problem that doesn't exist? More experienced users - do you verify plans before execution, or do you just trust the planner and fix issues as they come up?
0 likes • 16d
Hey, I think that's a great idea - one of the major structural flaws with Ai is it's training cut-off date - so using anything that has changed in approach/procedures after that date is likely to cause a problem I'd be interested in your hook, if you were willing to share? I have a script which allows GSD to be shared between antigravity & Opencode seamlessly so you can switch back & forth between them I also wonder would it be of benefit to have another AI model overview/analyse/criticise plans - no just for the issue you mention but other more general issues? I was doing this manually for a while between Antigravity Gemini 3-pro plans & ChatGPT review & it proved useful - chatGPT usually picking up flaws or improvements in plans - usually took ~3 cycles to iron out all issue sin the plans. It was what got me interested in GSD when I began to investigate how to automatically enable this other AI model evaluation of plans.
Intro: Artist and music producer here, curious but on the fence
So I'm a semi-retired artist/designer/music producer and curious about AI. I found TÂCHES in the Meta Mind Music community on Skool and discovered his new GSD/Claude Code project and I'm into it. While I make good use of AI chat bots, I haven't delved into vibe coding yet. I'm one of those people that gets scared off by terminal and the technical hurdles. Not to mention the price tag ($200/mo, yikes). In my experience, gen-AI has been a waste of time and money. Hitting my limits and putting more money in the slot machine to try and get it to do what I want. There's so much hype and marketing BS and I just want to find out what's honest and what works for me.
0 likes • 16d
I only just joined this community but started a thread "GSD for cheapskates" which allows Antigravity & Opencode to use the latest release of GSD and converts to their native folder & files structures (Antigravity skills is structured differently to most) so I can always be up-to-date with GSD features. It also means that for cheapskates, like me, I can use Google's free tier of Gemini 3-Pro & Opus 4.6 tokens until they run out and switch to Opencode with free or cheap AI models and continue in GSD here I left off. Don't know if this is of interest to all you fellow cheapskates?
GSD for cheapskates
I can't afford the $200+ per month subs needed to support full use of GSD so I'm investigating using it between Antigravity (with it's free timed windows for Gemini & Opus tokens) & Opencode using free or cheap AI models - being able to switch between these seamlessly as a project progresses. So when my free tokens are expired in Antigravity, switching over to Opencode & progressing the project until the 3-5H or 5D window refreshes the free tokens in Antigravity. AFAIK, this requires installing GSD in both Opencode & Antigravity but linking the together the different folders GSD uses as the working folder in each - .gsd in Antigravity & .planning in the Opencode GSD installation. I don't know why the Opencode installation from here https://github.com/rokicool/gsd-opencode/tree/main/gsd-opencode uses .planning instead of .gsd? Just setting this up, atm, to check it out
0 likes • 16d
One thought occurred to me - instead of using the AI to do research of an idea, and burning tokens, could GSD use a NotebookLM research report?
0 likes • 16d
OK, I was wrong to use the GSD-opencode install & then base my antigravity GSD files as symlinks to this install I've changed it to use a Claude global install (even though I don't use Claude) & then symlink my Opencode GSD to this & use an adapter script to symlink my antigravity global skills to ~/claude and my workflows symlinked also And it works but it also means that I can stay up-to-date with the changes made in the GSD repo as these are for claude & I just install latest & run my script to keep Opencode & Antigravity always using the latest version of GSD
What are you building with GSD?
Go on then... What are you using GSD for right? Share in the comments 👇
What are you building with GSD?
0 likes • 16d
Just built a new version from scratch of an app I had already finished but was unhappy with. It's an app to aid food & coffee takeaway outlets to maximise their customer flow & comply with the regulations regarding health, safety & hygiene when handling food stuffs. I'm using GSD integrated in both Antigravity & Opencode for lowest cost token use i.e free & I can switch between the two at any stage & it continues in the harness/IDE I'm impressed - now let's see if I can implement changes easily & how that goes?
Old Geezer that likes to get shit done
Hi, I'm a retired university lecturer & old codger programmer many years ago but I still have a personality (apologies to all the software engineers out there). Having time on my hands I started to get interested in AI in 2025 & late last year hit on an idea for a music-related app which started me down the rabbit hole of vibe coding. Too old & not interested in learning modern language coding so at the mercy of runaway, fickle AI model for coding. When the app was about 80% finished I started to find the AI slop in it when I went to make changes & realised that Ai coding were mostly fur coat & no drawers - looks good on the outside but don't delve too deep. So I started to try to put some manners on the AI models & like it says in GSD intro - most coding frameworks are for teams, corporate enterprise approaches which, as a solo enterprise, is just more work & complexity than necessary so I started to try to put some AI guardrails of my own. And then I came across GSD a while ago but as I'm a cheapskate & not a Claude user, I ignored it. But recently saw that a version for Opencode & AntiGravity were knocking around so here I am. I'm going to start a thread for cheapskate coders using GSD as that's the road I'm pursuing
0
0
1-5 of 5
John Kenny
1
3points to level up
@john-kenny-5632
Returning to app production after many years away now that AI has made re-entry a bit easier (maybe?). Let's see

Active 8d ago
Joined Feb 17, 2026
Dublin, Ireland
Powered by