Hey builders, Quick question for the community. Many of the workflows I’m running with Claude Code generate documents in .md format, which is great for structure and automation. The problem comes when converting them to PDF… they work, but they’re missing that super professional look (clean layout, typography, spacing, visual hierarchy, etc.). What I’m trying to find is a Claude Skill or workflow that can take .md files and produce really polished, client-ready PDFs. Ideally something that: - Applies professional layouts automatically - Handles titles, sections, callouts, tables, and spacing nicely - Produces PDFs you could send directly to a client or use in a report Does anyone here know a skill, tool, or workflow for this? Even better if you’ve personally tested it. Would love to hear what you’re using 🙌

I’m going to say something that not everyone will like: comparing Antigravity to Visual Studio Code sounds more like marketing than reality 💣 Yes, Antigravity may look fresher, simpler, and more attractive at first.But one thing is for a tool to look nice… and a very different thing is for it to keep up when real work starts 😅 💻 Visual Studio Code VS Code may not be the “sexy new thing” right now, but millions of developers keep coming back to it for one simple reason: it works, it scales, and it adapts to almost anything 🚀 ✅ Best things about VS Code: - Extremely versatile - Extensions for almost anything 🔌 - Massive community 🌍 - Great for both beginners and advanced users ❌ Worst things about VS Code: - It can get heavy if you overload it with extensions 🐘 - It takes time to set up properly - It doesn’t hold your hand: if you don’t know what you’re doing, it can feel overwhelming 😵 🪐 Antigravity And then there’s Antigravity… which for some people feels like a fresh new option, and for others just a “prettier” version of something that still isn’t on the same level 😬 Yes, it may be simpler. Yes, it may feel more beginner-friendly. Yes, it may look more modern. But here comes the uncomfortable question: is it actually better… or just easier at the beginning? 🤔 ✅ Best things about Antigravity: - More direct and visual - Less friction when getting started 🙌 - Can feel more intuitive - Great for people who want speed without much setup ❌ Worst things about Antigravity: - Much less flexible - Smaller community, less support, fewer resources - It can hit a ceiling pretty fast 🚧 - When you need real power, it may stop shining Unpopular opinion 🚨 Antigravity gets attention, but VS Code is still the serious option. Because a tool shouldn’t be judged by how pretty it looks at the beginning, but by how far it can actually take you. And that’s exactly where many “modern alternatives” start running out of gas ⛽ 💬 Am I being unfair… or just saying the uncomfortable truth? Let me know in the comments 👇

This full guide shows exactly how to go from zero to your first agentic AI workflow in 26 minutes with Claude Code, step by step. This is the most valuable video I've ever made on Agentic AI Workflows, so make sure you watch this full tutorial. Hope you enjoy!

Not because their service is worse. But because while their competitors show up in front of the exact decision-maker at the exact moment, they’re still waiting for word of mouth to work on its own. I’ve just finished a complete advertising plan for a Facilities Management company in Spain. Budget: €480/month. Objective: generate quote requests from operations directors and facility managers in their region. Estimated results with that budget: 📈 3,500 monthly visits from qualified decision-makers 💶 Cost per click below €0.20 📋 Potential for 10–20 quote requests per month And most importantly: A single Facilities contract is worth between €20,000 and €100,000 per year. With a €480 investment. Just one. Paid advertising isn’t only for big brands or e-commerce stores. It’s the most predictable way to put your business in front of the person who makes the buying decision, at the exact moment they’re searching for exactly what you offer. If you’re not there, you’re letting someone else take that space. If you run a local or B2B services business and want to know which platform fits you best and how to structure a campaign from scratch: ✍️ Write your industry in the comments. The full plan includes platform selection, campaign structure, creative script, landing page design, and step-by-step setup.

Do you know where most business cards you collect at a trade show end up? In a drawer. Or worse: in the pocket of a jacket you won't wear again until next year. And with them, you lose business opportunities, conversation context, and that "hot lead" who seemed so interesting at the time. The real problem A client (BUSINESS GROUP) reached out with a very specific challenge: they'll be exhibiting at SICUR26 and wanted their sales team to capture leads quickly, without friction, and have those contacts land directly in their CRM (Clientify). The traditional process looks like this: 1. You grab the card → 2 seconds 2. You put it in your pocket → 1 second 3. Back at the hotel, you manually enter it into the CRM → 3-5 minutes (if you even do it) 4. You try to remember what you talked about → impossible Result: 70% of business cards never get processed. And those that do arrive without context. The solution: a PWA with integrated AI I built a mobile app (PWA) that does this: 📸 Take a photo of the card (front and back if needed) 🤖 AI extracts automatically: name, company, title, phone numbers, email, address, website, LinkedIn... ✏️ Verify the data in a form (in case the AI misses something) 📝 Add notes: "Interested in product X", "Call in March", "Spoke with Juan" 🚀 Send to CRM with one tap Total time: 20 seconds. And if there's no connection in the exhibition hall, no problem. The app saves everything offline and syncs automatically when the connection returns. I did the math: If you enter the data manually, each card takes about 4 minutes between finding it, opening the CRM, typing in the fields, and trying to remember what you talked about. At a trade show where you collect 50 cards, that's 3 hours and 20 minutes of administrative work. With the app, the entire process takes 20 seconds per lead. Those same 50 contacts get processed in just 16 minutes. Savings: over 3 hours that the sales rep can spend on what actually matters: selling.