Isaac Wright, Jr. was wrongfully jailed for 10 years. He studied law In prison. He proved he was innocent. Became an attorney. Sent the judge who imprisoned him to prison. He was arrested in 1989 convicted in 1991 and sentenced to life in prison for charges he didn't commit. When he was released in 1996 he had served about 7 years. After release, Issac earned a bachelor's degree in 2002 and a law degree in 2007, then passed the New Jersey bar exam on his first try, but faced a nine-year character review before admission in 2017. Issac is the first person in U.S. history to secure his own exoneration from a life sentence and then become a licensed attorney in the same jurisdiction. Here’s the thing….All court cases are similar to a tennis match, but with criminals. They are criminals, it’s what they do. So instead of focusing on criminals acting like criminals, focus on what you can control. They are criminals but they are also grownups and you can’t tell grownups what to do. Don’t worry about them. Let them manage their case and you do the same. Here’s a broad stoke on how to manage your case… Learn the rules and procedures of the court and the law of your case. That’s it. Literally. By law, the court must provide the rules and procedures of the court to everyone, either through calling their employees or visiting their website. Either way, everybody has to follow them. Remember when you were younger and you wanted to play a new game, but you had to learn the rules of the game so you’ll know how to play? And remember how some people thought they were too special to follow the rules so they would lie, cheat, and finesse? Just doing everything and anything just to win. Court is the same way. It is ran by a bunch of childish and immature people with titles doing the most. It would actually be funny if it wasn’t so harmful. Next, find the law of your case….Meaning, support your position. How? Find cases that are similar to your case that had a favorable outcome. Why? Because they’ve already done the heavy lifting. They already did the research. They have the references and laws to back it up. And if you find a Supreme Court case, that’s even better.

If you think your legal trauma is special, rare, or unique... it is not. If you think I want to read a wall of words about your experience in private... I don’t. If you think I want to commiserate about legal trauma... I don’t. If you think I want fans... I don’t. What I want is an army of empowered warriors ready to heed the call when I livestream across America. Do not DM me. If you DM me... I will not respond and you will be removed from this community. If DMing continues, this community will be closed. Why? Because DMing shows you believe your case is for my private attention instead of the community’s learning. That’s unfair to everyone here. I want everyone to feel empowered enough to share publicly in our group so others can learn, grow, and be helped. Private messages do not build collective power. If you need help, post your question here without tagging me. Our members and I can offer answers, resources, and support that benefit everyone. No DMs. Fairness matters. We rise together.

I want to know what kind of cases you’re most interested in learning about. But here’s the rule: You can ONLY answer with the type of case. 👇 Examples of short answers for this post: - Child Support - Child Custody - Traffic Court - Bad Neighbor - Noise Issue - Contract Issue - Employment Issue - Civil Court - Criminal Court - Bank Issue - Credit Report - Family Court - Landlord-Tenant Court - Foreclosure - Other matter Drop your answer below ⬇️ This will help me tailor content to exactly what you need. Remember: One word or short phrase only, do not go into any details about the case. Reminder: Like this post to feed the algorithm, it help others find our community

Detrimental reliance happens when you rely on someone in authority to act fairly and follow the rules — and you get harmed because they didn’t. In law, it means: 👉 You reasonably believed the judge (or authority) would behave according to law, fairness, and due process… 👉 You relied on that belief during your case… 👉 And because the judge violated those standards, you suffered harm, loss, or prejudice. It is rooted in equity — meaning the court must act honorably if it expects YOU to honor its rulings. 🧠 Why It Matters in Judicial Misconduct Cases Most people walk into court believing: - The judge will be neutral - The judge will follow procedure - The judge will listen to evidence - The judge will not insult, bully, or shame them That expectation is reasonable. Judges swear an oath to do exactly that. So when a judge behaves like a wayward, rude, biased, or hostile authority figure, you can argue: “I relied on the court’s duty of fairness and that reliance led to harm because the judge abandoned neutrality.” This is detrimental reliance. ⚖️ How to Use Detrimental Reliance in Your Case...You can raise detrimental reliance in: 1. Judicial Misconduct Complaints Point out that you relied on the judge’s oath and legal duty to conduct themselves with fairness and impartiality — and that the misconduct caused: - Loss of rights - Skewed rulings - Financial harm - Reputation damage - Emotional/psychological injury - Procedural injustice 2. Motions to Vacate or Reconsider Show that the entire ruling is tainted because you relied on a “fair tribunal” that didn’t exist. A biased judge = constitutional defect. 3. Appeals Appeals LOVE this argument.Judges cannot violate your reliance on fundamental fairness. If they do, the ruling is often reversible error. 4. Civil Rights Lawsuits (42 USC § 1983) If the misconduct rises to a constitutional violation, detrimental reliance strengthens your argument that: - You expected due process - You were denied due process - You suffered actual harm because of that denial