Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

AI Automation Society

202.6k members • Free

Max Business School™

261.2k members • Free

103 contributions to AI Automation Society
AI News – December 5, 2025
The industry just pivoted from “chatbots” to autonomous AI agents: Google launched Gemini 3 with Deep Think reasoning, AWS killed the chatbot era at re:Invent with long-running “frontier agents” on new Trainium3 chips, Anthropic signed a $200M Snowflake deal for enterprise agents, Mistral dropped efficient new models, and OpenAI bought Neptune for persistent memory — while safety scores remain mediocre and GPU supply is choking. In short: 2025 is the year AI stops talking and starts working by itself.
0 likes • 7h
@Hicham Char obviously 👌
🚀New Video: Unlock the Full Power of Your n8n Agents (new instance MCP)
In this video, I break down n8n’s new instance-level MCP and show you why it is a big upgrade from running your own MCP Server Trigger inside a workflow. I explain what it is, how it works, and the key differences you need to know so you can get the most out of it. I also walk through how to connect the new MCP to tools like ChatGPT, Claude, and Lovable so your AI agents can take real actions inside your n8n instance. You’ll see practical examples, simple use cases, and a full demo of how to think about using this in your daily life to automate tasks, speed up your workflow, and make your AI tools much more useful. If you want to understand how to unlock the full power of AI agents inside n8n, this video will show you exactly how to get started.
1 like • 7h
@Nate Herk thank you for your tireless effort brother !🙏
My Compliance System Couldn't Read Its Own Audit Documents (Embarrassing Fix Inside) 🔥
Built compliance tracking workflow using community template. Deadline notifications, task assignments, status reporting - perfect automation. But compliance documents? Someone still manually reading 40-page audit reports. Extracting findings. Copying requirements. Creating remediation tasks. 8-10 hours per audit. While using an automation template. THE GAP: Template tracks compliance tasks brilliantly. Sends alerts. Routes assignments. Monitors completion. Dashboard shows everything. But creating those tasks from audit findings? Still manual document reading. Someone highlighting. Typing. Categorizing. Creating tasks one by one. THE REALITY: Regulatory audit arrives: 40 pages, 23 findings, 47 specific requirements, 12 different deadlines, 5 severity levels. Someone reads entire audit. Highlights findings. Types into tracking system. Categorizes by severity. Assigns owners. Sets deadlines. Creates monitoring tasks. Takes full day. Then the template takes over and automates everything beautifully. Missing: Reading the audit document itself. THE EXTENSION: Added audit document intelligence. Audit PDF uploaded → Extract findings automatically → Identify requirements → Extract deadlines → Categorize by severity → Create tracking tasks → Assign based on rules → System ready. Complete audit processing: 15 minutes (was 8 hours). WHAT IT EXTRACTS: Finding descriptions and severity levels. Specific compliance requirements. Deadline dates and terms. Responsible parties mentioned. Remediation steps suggested. Reference standards cited. Evidence requirements specified. THE TRANSFORMATION: Before: Receive audit → Manual processing 8 hours → Tasks ready next day → Team starts remediation After: Receive audit → Upload PDF → Review extraction → Tasks ready in 15 minutes same day → Team starts immediately Team starts remediation immediately instead of waiting for task creation. Critical findings get attention same day, not next day. THE NUMBERS: Audits processed quarterly: 4
1 like • 11h
@Duy Bui 👌
Outreach companion
Hii everyone, I'm looking for a person who can do outreach. Especially from UK and Europe. Must be professional and a little experience. All the information is must be correct about you. If you fit in this tell me about you.
2 likes • 1d
@Muskan Ahlawat 🤔
Contracts Now Validate Themselves Before Sales Sees Them (3-Day Review → 2 Hours) 🔥
Sales pipeline template from community works perfectly. Lead tracking, communication automation, deal progression - all flawless. Contract stage though? Bottleneck city. Sales closes deal → Sends contract to legal → Legal finds issues → Back to sales → Fixed → Resubmitted → 4-5 days wasted. Not because legal was slow. Because half the contracts had basic policy violations that sales should've caught. THE PROBLEM PATTERN: Payment terms wrong. Liability limits off. SLAs that operations can't deliver. Discount levels exceeding authority. Terms legal always rejects. Sales sent anyway. Legal sent back. Sales fixed. Resubmitted. Another 2 days. Average: 4-5 days at contract stage. Killing deal velocity. Worse: Some deals lost during delay. Competitors moving faster. I ADDED CONTRACT PRE-VALIDATION: Before legal sees contracts, workflow checks against company policy automatically. Payment terms match policy? Check. Liability within acceptable range? Check. SLAs achievable? Check. Discount level authorized? Check. Standard terms present? Check. ALL compliant → Send to legal (clean contracts only) Issues found → Back to sales with specific fixes needed Catches errors before legal ever sees them. WHAT HAPPENED: Legal review time: 2-3 days → 1 day Why? They're only seeing contracts that are actually ready. No basic policy violations. No missing required clauses. Sales catches mistakes BEFORE bothering legal. Average contract stage: 4-5 days → 1-2 days Deal velocity improved immediately. Competitors can't match our speed now. THE MATH: 3 days saved per deal 12 deals monthly 36 days of cycle time eliminated Closed 2 deals that would've been lost to delay LEGAL TEAM FEEDBACK: "Contracts arriving are actually reviewable now. Not spending time on basic policy compliance. Can focus on real legal review." Sales team feedback: "Getting instant policy checks helps us write better contracts from the start. Learning what's acceptable." VALIDATION CHECKS: Payment terms against approved ranges. Discount levels within authority limits. Liability caps match policy. Required clauses present. Renewal terms standard. SLA commitments operations can deliver. Pricing structure follows guidelines.
2 likes • 1d
@Duy Bui 👍
1-10 of 103
Hussein Ibrahim
5
201points to level up
@hussein-ibrahim-9475
Digital creator, content writer, teacher. Self-designated human rights defender. Fiercely independent, yet a believer in interdependence.

Active 5h ago
Joined Oct 15, 2025
Powered by