🔥 Just finished my 1st AI animated short. Would love your thoughts. "The Beast That Feared a Tiny Firefly: Luma's Brave Journey" The reference frames and a few shots were made using Google Flow, and the maximum scenes were made using OpenArt.ai. Everything from the bioluminescent forest to the Shadow Beast was generated through prompt engineering. A few things I'm still figuring out and would love feedback on: → Fighting scenes- struggling with it. → The emotional pacing — does the ending land for you? → Anything about the visual style that feels off For most of the scene prompts, I used a 6-part prompt formula [Subject + Action + Setting + Camera + Style + Audio] with reference images method between clips to keep the world consistent.

Hey all! I put together a boilerplate repo for the AI assistant I built. I'm using it daily and continuously upgrading it as I learn more about orchestration, automation, security, etc. Here is the repo link if you want to tear it apart. Any feedback is appreciated. https://github.com/Bagu-Hanto/riggs_boilerplate

After 17 years of research into how people actually learn English, David Anthony 🇦🇺 Master Business English Coach and I built something that didn't exist yet. Not a multiple choice test that gives you a score and leaves you there. Not an app that congratulates you on a streak while you still can't say what you mean in a meeting. CLARIQ is precision diagnostics for English. It doesn't just tell you WHERE you stand it tells you WHY you're there and WHAT specifically to do next. Per domain. Per level. Personal. Think of it as a financial audit for your language skills not "you're B1" but "your prepositions sit at upper intermediate, your verb tenses at lower intermediate, and here is your 12-week plan to close that gap." We just went live at https://getclariq.com Early users can test for free. No credit card, no commitment. We want honest feedback from people who are serious about their English. Who is this for? - Professionals who notice their English is "good enough" but not good enough - HR managers who want to know where their team really stands - Anyone done with generic language tests that tell you nothing useful Go to getclariq.com and try it. Takes 15 minutes. The results will surprise you. Feedback? Send me a message. We're building this together.

Hey everyone, I built a Google Sheet that has every video I've published in 2026 along with the links to all resources, tools, and files mentioned in each one. If you're ever looking for something I referenced in a video, start here: 📌 YouTube Video Database This will get updated as new videos drop. Bookmark it. - Nate

I used to wonder why two people could ask Claude the same question and get completely different answers. One person would get a vague, generic response they'd have to rework three times. The other would get something so precise and useful, it felt like the AI had read their mind. Same tool. Same question. Wildly different output. Then I stumbled onto something, almost by accident, that changed the way I work with AI forever. And once you see it, you can't unsee it. Here's what I discovered: The quality of your output isn't determined by the AI. It's determined by the quality of the instruction you give it. Most of us type a prompt the way we'd fire off a WhatsApp message, fast, rough, half-formed. And the AI does its best with what it's given. Which isn't much. But what if you could hand the AI a better version of your own prompt, before it even starts working? That's exactly what this trick does. Here's the process: Write your prompt out in a Google Doc or a text file first. Don't worry about making it perfect. Just get your thoughts down. Then paste it into Claude (or ChatGPT) and add this one line before you hit send: "Do not execute this prompt yet. Improve it, the grammar, the clarity, the explanation. Rewrite it so you can give me the best possible response." That's it. What comes back will be sharper, more specific, and better structured than anything you typed. Then you take that improved version, start a fresh chat, and paste it in as your actual prompt. The difference in output quality is not subtle. Try it once. Write a rough prompt as you normally would. Then use this method. Compare the two responses side by side. I'll be surprised if you ever go back to the old way.