Tomorrow (Tuesday 2nd Dec) we have our Affiliate Marketing session, this will be on for 30 minutes, but be great for anyone wanting to move forward with a sovereign enterprise. Thursday will be our normal PGM at 7.30pm, i will be going over some research regarding the small claims track CPR27 issues i have covered recently, and HOW to still fight your corner if you are in the small claims track and how to handle judges "Discretion" PLUS, i screen shot all of the spies comments last week, obfuscation for sure, but clarity is vital, so i will be covering the comments that were made, should be very interesting, hopw to see you there, links in the calendar section for all meetings

We had a visitor to out normal friendly PGM tonight, i am making a new video presentation just for that intruder, cover all of the posts they made, as i copied them all, they then went on to send me abuse in private messages, i did not reply, i reported them to skool.com and blocked them, But as i say, i copied all of the post made and will create another video going over each point in law and under GDPR etc. Go have a look, the PGM is in the classroom

I just wanted to check the status of Marstons Holdings Ltd (as we got a letter requesting money). On companies house it seems that Marstons Holdings is under Scott & Co (Scotland) LLP? There are no directors listed. I'm a bit confused as I thought that there had to be a director or designated person listed? Can someone help me here? Is Marstons legally allowed to demand payments as a DCA while not listing people on Companies House? Thanks... https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/LDep7U2ex1wGeQzi1uK5XMNAOmQ/appointments

I've attended the local magistrates court and was not allowed to speak (as I said i was there by special appearance and was not the PERSON) so the pantomime continued and I was sent a letter (from the council) saying the LO was served... now got a DCA with quite an aggressive tone in their letters. I told them that i'm taking the case to the county court and so all DCA activity should be on-hold. The latest letter says they will not respond again and will attend the property and take 'goods'. Any ideas on next steps here? I'm using the CT BOT but struggling a bit... (using the lack of due process for the issue, bulk hearings and sham court case)...

Just seen this on Facebook then the post above said trainee solicitors are quoting their jobs 💥 The recent High Court ruling in Mazur & Anor v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has sent a powerful message throughout the legal and regulatory landscape: Only authorised, licensed individuals may perform reserved legal activities. Supervision, delegation, or automation are not substitutes for personal legal authorisation. For years, many administrative and enforcement actions including debt collection, housing possession claims, benefit deductions, and warrant applications have been processed by unqualified or automated systems operating under the assumption of institutional authority. The Mazur judgment makes it clear that such practices are unlawful where they involve the conduct of litigation or other reserved legal acts. The Court confirmed that: • Reserved legal activities, such as the conduct of litigation, preparation of legal instruments, or applications before a court, may only be undertaken by an authorised person or exempt person under the Legal Services Act 2007. • Employment or supervision within a law firm does not give an unqualified person legal authority to perform those tasks. • Any act carried out by an unlicensed person that amounts to a reserved legal activity may be void, unlawful, and potentially criminal under section 14 of the Act. This ruling reinforces that legal authority cannot be borrowed. Each individual carrying out a reserved act must be personally authorised, properly trained, and accountable. This judgment extends far beyond law firms. It raises serious questions about the legality of administrative enforcement processes conducted without qualified oversight such as: 1. Possession or Eviction Proceedings issued by unqualified staff or automated systems. 2. Charging Orders placed on property by debt collectors acting without a practising solicitor. 3. Warrants of Entry obtained by utility companies or enforcement agents without licensed representation.