Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Dima

AI Agents | OpenClaw

101 members • Free

OpenClaw builders sharing real agent setups, cost optimization, configs, and advanced workflows. Build smarter AI with hands on support.

Memberships

OpenClaw Users

829 members • Free

Skoolers

195.6k members • Free

12 contributions to AI Agents | OpenClaw
🧠 Dropped 17 PDFs. Agent found the answer in 2 seconds without opening a single file.
Real RAG: PDF → vectors → semantic search. Your agent doesn't read documents — it searches a knowledge base. $0.01 to index, $0.0001 per query. Advanced 4 is live.
2
0
🧠 Dropped 17 PDFs. Agent found the answer in 2 seconds without opening a single file.
🛡️ My agent tried to read /etc/passwd. The system said no.
Three layers of guardrails: Soul rules for guidance. Config blocks for enforcement. Approval gates for control. Your agent is powerful — now it's also safe. Advanced 3 is live.
2
0
🛡️ My agent tried to read /etc/passwd. The system said no.
Claude has improved dramatically over the past year, and I use it daily, BUT ....
there is a business problem almost no one talks about enough: Businesses are paying not only for useful output, but also for the AI’s mistakes, retries, ignored instructions, and admitted failures. I recently got this response from Claude: “That’s worse than a rookie mistake; that’s me violating CLAUDE.md rules #4, #5, and #7 … be honest / follow documented rules strictly / no assumptions.” Think about that for a second. The AI knew the rules. The AI admitted it broke the rules. And the user still paid for the bad output, the wasted tokens, and the lost time. From a business perspective, that is not a small issue. That is a real operational cost. We spend too much time talking about benchmarks, speed, and model improvements, and not enough time talking about the hidden cost of failure: retries, corrections, extra usage, team delays, and trust erosion. If AI is becoming part of business infrastructure, then reliability and instruction-following should matter just as much as raw capability. Why are customers expected to absorb the cost of the model’s mistakes? That seems backwards to me.
🔔 Pushed code. Got a review in Telegram 30 seconds later. Never asked for it.
Github Webhook → your agent reads the diff → structured review lands in your topic. No browser, no typing, no dashboard. Just push and read. Advanced classroom, article 2 is live.
2
0
🏁 10 articles. Zero to a multi-agent team. The foundation is done.
🔥 What should we teach next? Advanced classroom is coming — you pick the topics. The beginner foundation is complete: 10 articles, zero to a multi-agent team. Config → Soul → Tools → Skills → Chaining → Memory → Voice In → Voice Out → Web → Multi-Agent. Part 10 just dropped — your agents now delegate tasks to each other. The beginner classroom keeps going. But something bigger is brewing. We're designing an Advanced classroom — and you decide what's in it. No syllabus yet. No roadmap. Just one question: What do you actually need help with? → Stuck on something? Drop it → Tried a setup and it broke? Drop it → Want your agents to do something but can't figure out how? Drop it → Saw a feature with zero docs? Drop it. Every message here is a vote for the next article. The best problems become step-by-step guides — same style, same screenshots, same "it just works." We don't teach theory. We solve your problems and write it up. 👇🦀
2 likes • 10d
I'd love to see a webhooks article, it'll be useful for everyone with an advanced setup
1-10 of 12
Dima Citizen
3
32points to level up
@dima-nazarenko-8289
AI Automations

Active 2d ago
Joined Feb 26, 2026
Miami
Powered by