Just dropped a new course in the classroom and I'm pretty pumped about this one. It's the full step-by-step on building your own AI OS. Same exact setup I use every day to run the YouTube channel, the community, and my team. 8 lessons, all my templates and prompts, plus a free GitHub repo so you can skip the boring setup and just start building. To unlock it in the classroom, you just need to hit level 3 in the community. Honestly pretty easy: - Drop an intro post if you haven't yet - Engage with a few other members in the threads - Help somebody out who's stuck on something That's pretty much it. Get to level 3 and the whole thing opens up. See you in there. - Nate

Learning best practice? Use /config in your terminal to make Claude Code your teacher. Choose Explanatory mode to make Claude explain its choices. Choose Learning mode to make Claude test you. Claude team at Anthropic are using and loving these modes too! 😎 Have you tried them?

Let's get to know each other! Comment below sharing where you are in the world, a career goal you have, and something you like to do for fun. 😊

Andrej Karpathy just joined Anthropic, and the why behind it is way more interesting than the headline. In this video I break down how Karpathy's recent work on context engineering, the LLM Wiki, and /goal-style autonomous loops lines up almost perfectly with what Claude Code has already been shipping. Then I share three predictions for where Anthropic goes from here, including a possible app store for context and an education layer for packaging your own workflows.

Private equity deal. Target company had 2,400 documents in the data room. Standard timeline: 6 weeks for legal and financial due diligence. Our timeline: Competing bid closing in 5 days. Either move fast or lose the deal. The documents: Contracts, financials, employment agreements, IP filings, litigation history, customer agreements. All PDFs. All unstructured. Built a due diligence extraction pipeline. Document uploaded to data room. System classifies document type. Extracts key terms based on document category. Flags risk indicators. Populates due diligence checklist automatically. 72 hours later: - All 2,400 documents processed - 340 contracts analyzed for change of control provisions - 47 potential issues flagged - 12 deal-breakers identified One contract had a change of control clause that would have triggered $4.2M in penalties. Found it on page 34 of an amendment. Would have missed it in a standard review timeline. Won the bid. Closed the deal. The speed was the competitive advantage. What opportunity have you lost because analysis took too long?