Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

ContractorOS

141 members • $49/month

Construction Contractors Hub

920 members • Free

5 contributions to Construction Contractors Hub
Conceptual Estimating: What’s Your Go-To Strategy
Curious how other CPMs and preconstruction leaders are approaching conceptual estimating strategy. What has proven most effective in establishing reliable cost direction before design fully matures? Interested in hearing what is working in today’s environment.
1 like • Feb 11
Strong approach. Are you reconciling parameters into the final bid against a UniFormat–CSI structure?cost continuity materially improves my forecast accuracy.
1 like • 29d
CSI is the industry standard for organizing work by trade and is what most teams rely on during buyout. UniFormat supports earlier planning by grouping costs around major building systems before the details are fully defined. Together, they create continuity from early budgeting through procurement. The goal is dependable cost tracking as the project evolves.
Trying to get some clarity on terminology
Can I ask some opinions on what the correct terminology This is important for my software haha. I dont want to confuse people. 1. Tender vs Bid. Which word do you use to describe the set of documents your client sends you? 2. Direct vs Indirect cost. What do you call a cost you incure, but don't want to show in the cleient pricing schedule 3. Letter of offer. Is that the word you use to dsecribe the letter you submit to your client detailing your inclusions and exclusions?
2 likes • Feb 5
U.S. CM/GC you'll probably hear consistently 1 bid documents or bid set describe procurement phase. CDs describe design phase 2 direct ,indirect or overhead (internal). If I incur a cost but choose not to expose it separately to the client, I typically carry it within General Conditions or Fee 3 most teams use proposal
Do you have a framework for delivering projects?
I heard this the other day on Linkedin. But the guy broke down projects into three pillars: Find work Bid projects at a price/terms and conditions you can deliver them. Probably the hardest part cause construction is so heavily commoditized. Do work Complete the scope defined in the contract. Pouring concrete, trenching, standing steel etc. Do whats on the drawings, and check what you built was correct. Get paid Contract admin. Payment claims, variations etc. The only thing I’d probably add is completions. Handing over the project at the end.
1 like • Feb 3
There's tension in construction that you may recognize immediately: Competitive bidding rewards compliance. Successful delivery requires skepticism. This is the industry paradox: Owners want price certainty. Builders need assumption clarity. The best contractors learn how to respect the bid structure while still identifying exposure
0 likes • Feb 3
I tend to use sensitivity to quantify what materially moves the job, but pressure-testing comes first to confirm the plan is truly buildable. I have seen projects that looked mathematically sound on paper prove operationally unrealistic in execution. Integrating sensitivity analysis into a platform like Operum could give teams far better visibility into the cost and schedule drivers before making commitments. Would be interested in seeing what that looks like.
Introduce Yourself
I'm keen to hear who everybody is, and what their goals are I assume you already know who I am. But if you don't I'm Tim. I worked for 8 years for big contractors on road, rail, renewable energy projects. I've always worked for head-contractors. I recently worked for some smaller contractors as a consultant when I left my job doing estimating and contract management. It was good, but I found it hard to see a path to scale (other than just starting a contracting business myself) So I instead decided to build software, and found that that's 100x harder than I thought and a very easy way to lose money
Introduce Yourself
2 likes • Feb 3
Hi everyone, glad to be here. Tim, I appreciate the effort you put into helping people better understand the business of construction. That commitment to the industry is a big reason I joined. I’m a Construction Project Manager with experience in land development and complex projects, with a primary focus on preconstruction strategy. Looking forward to learning from the group and contributing where I can.
Big Data in Construction - Hype or Helpful?
Something I've been really interested in is the role of big data in construction. So far all I see is hype. And the hype has been around for at least a decade. I went to a presentation where they spoke for an hour about how data is transforming construction. Construction companies need more data. Etc. etc. When the speaker got asked how they use data, he said they compare their planned and actual costs. Oh really? So does everybody else on earth through their accounting system. It must be one of the consistently most overhyped concepts. (This article from 10 years ago talks about how data is more important than money) https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2016/04/19/how-big-data-and-analytics-are-transforming-the-construction-industry/?utm_source=canva&utm_medium=iframely I am really interested to ask though, has anybody found genuinely useful applications of data to construction? Has anybody seen good applications? I do think with AI, there are two big changes: 1. Context/background information is increasingly important to get AI to do effective work 2. Unstructured data can now be useful
2 likes • Feb 3
I’ve found real-world production data is what allows teams to pressure-test assumptions and surface risk early. In many cases, the projects that perform best are won in preconstruction, where labor intelligence becomes a true strategic advantage.
1-5 of 5
DaricK Korzeniewski
2
8points to level up
@darick-korzeniewski-5921
CPM with deep experience in land development and project delivery. Focused on sharing practical insights to streamline execution and reduce risk.

Active 1d ago
Joined Jan 30, 2026
Powered by