LIKE JUST STUFF you can too go for it

Yet another Build for the future of the schools Ecosystem The Zetsumetsu Corpoation & Zetsu EDU Presents ViewZ ViewZ: Zetsu ViewZ is an AI short-film creator network where you drop episodes and build mini-movies. Create sets of AI shorts that connect into cohesive, frame-by-frame narrative stories—story chains built from AI shorts. When your chain is complete, it becomes a mini-movie featured on the ViewZ Movie Station. Zetsu ViewZ is the mini premiere studio where they drop—your AI storyverse inside the Zetsumetsu Eoe Reality. MORE LATER TODAY GUYS BRB -------- © 2025 Zetsumetsu Corporation™ All systems, products, and materials are the property of Zetsumetsu Corporation. Unauthorized use or reproduction is prohibited. Zetsumetsu EOe™ | Zetsu EDU™ | Zetsu R&D ⓒ | © 2024 - 2025 Zetsumetsu Corporation™ | Artworqq Kevin Suber

How will you prove early retention, engagement, and demand beyond building the product? This was a question I was asked today by a fellow LinkedIn lover. The question itself was a bit more rounded than that, but I realized the response deserved to be public because it’s useful information. Although my list of accomplishments spans 160+ projects, I’m not afraid to say I’m still new to Sales as a Service and Leadership as a nurtured skill. I’m not perfect,.. I’m just really good at a lot of things. I’d genuinely like some feedback. What do you all think of my response? ---------------------- William Harbour ------------------ That was all very useful information that I need to consider, and I appreciate you taking the time to write that. Although, that is the issue I plan to solve. Validation = Proof of Work My Zetsumetsu Corporation is not here to change that, but to change the order of the structure that creates it. ------------------ ZetsuEDU is about Structure. ----------------- If we make Proof of Work = the Process of Creation, then we can effectively apply Enactive Cognition. Thinking that arises through active engagement, not passive memorization. In this way, validation comes from the act of doing. You don't need to prove retention and engagement metrics, when you are the retention and engagement metrics. People already complain about hack solutions and pay competitors for what is already available (like what's happening here). --------------- Zetsu EDU — Project-Based Validation -------------- I ensure Zetsu EDU's project-based validation process by structuring each framework personally based on Zetsu logic. The same work that created the Zetsumetsu EOE reality we are speaking inside of today. --------- Validation Layers --------- Student ships a working app, site, system, or artifact → Outcome validation The thing runs, deploys, renders, compiles, or performs → Review validation Instructor checks against defined requirements → Gate validation

Its getting close guys .. Santa knows what i like.

https://www.skool.com/noobemy-4711/any-experience-with-paid-traffic?p=f6e4219d just as anything goes, results may vary. But anytime your dealing with traffic in general its about volume. You don't pay to increase the traffic that comes from your post or product propagation Take my You tube for example .. I started 2 weeks ago and already hit 17,000 views this is only from 75 to 95 subs so that mean either every person watched a short (10 seconds ) video 150 times or the volume from the paid traffic was multiplied The paid part is just how you multiply the increase. I would have to say my fav part is understanding that its not about the amount you pay it about how you pay. IF you do am ad camp, split test and 1 runs for a week with a 800 investment and the other runs for 1 days with a 300 investment which one do you think will get more traffic? The answer is the smaller one. Because traffic is about volume and 800 is not enough to spread across a weeks time. That's why i was able to accumulate so many views over a short period of time. i combined the two techniques to "kaio ken" or dual multiply the results with only $10 across 2 days. SHOULD I TURN THIS INTO A COURSE ... I THINK SO