Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

AI SAAS Builders (Workshops)

4.9k members • Free

SaaS Life

252 members • Free

First Time Founders

441 members • Free

AgentVoice

586 members • Free

n8n

1.3k members • Free

AI n8n Automation Collective

2.5k members • Free

The AI Advantage

75.7k members • Free

AI Automation (A-Z)

137.3k members • Free

AI Automation Society

279.4k members • Free

7 contributions to AI SAAS Builders (Workshops)
Visibility
One of the biggest reasons good businesses struggle isn’t because their product or service is bad, it’s because people don’t know they exist. Visibility simply means: are the right people seeing you? You can have the best offer in the world, but if no one sees it, nothing happens. Think about how you discover new businesses: - You see a post a few times - Someone mentions them - You search on Google - You click a website That’s visibility at work. A common mistake is trying to be everywhere at once, Instagram, TikTok, email, ads, everything, and then burning out. Visibility doesn’t mean “be everywhere.” It means show up consistently where your audience already is. Another thing people miss: visibility isn’t just about posting. It's also about being easy to find when someone goes looking for you. That’s where things like Google, websites, and clear profiles matter. Most customers don’t buy the first time they see you. They notice you, disappear, see you again, then come back when they’re ready. Visibility creates familiarity, and familiarity builds trust. SO: - Where do most people currently find your business? - And where should they be finding you? Drop your thoughts below. Let’s talk.
2 likes • 9d
100% agree on picking one or two platforms and going deep instead of spreading thin. I wasted months trying to be on every platform and got zero traction. Once I focused on just showing up consistently in communities like this one and actually helping people with real answers, things started clicking. Visibility isn't about volume, it's about being in the right rooms and adding value consistently.
1 like • 7d
@Kev Blackburn exactly, thank you!
Client paid their agency $31k over 4 months for "workflow optimization." I recreated everything from scratch in 67 minutes. Runs 4x faster.
Client paid their agency $31k over 4 months for "workflow optimization." I recreated everything from scratch in 67 minutes. Runs 4x faster. Sometimes starting over beats fixing broken things. THE PROBLEM Client: "Our workflows are getting slower" Agency: "You need our optimization package" Client: "What's that involve?" Agency: "Performance audit, code refactoring, architecture improvements" Cost: $31,000 Timeline: 4 months Month 1: Audit phase Month 2: Planning phase Month 3: Implementation Month 4: Testing and rollout Client paid. THE RESULTS After 4 months and $31k: - Workflows 12% faster - Three new bugs introduced - Monthly maintenance required - Additional $2k/month ongoing support Client called me: "This doesn't feel right" THE ANALYSIS Me: "Show me the workflows" Client shares access. I review their system. What I see: - 9 workflows - Overly complex routing - Redundant steps everywhere - Built like spaghetti code Me: "Your agency optimized this?" Client: "That's what they said" Me: "They polished a mess" THE SOLUTION Me: "Let me rebuild these from scratch" Client: "How long?" Me: "Give me an hour" Client: "For the estimate?" Me: "For the rebuild" THE REBUILD 1:00 PM - Open Skada.ai Workflow 1: Lead processing - Agency version: 24 nodes, 8 seconds - My version: Generated in 4 minutes, runs in 1.8 seconds Workflow 2: Order fulfillment - Agency version: 31 nodes, 12 seconds - My version: Generated in 6 minutes, runs in 2.4 seconds Workflow 3-9: Same pattern 2:07 PM - Done All 9 workflows rebuilt. All tested. All deployed. THE PERFORMANCE Agency's "optimized" workflows: - Average execution: 9.2 seconds - Error rate: 3.1% - Maintenance: Weekly updates needed My rebuilt workflows: - Average execution: 2.1 seconds - Error rate: 0.1% - Maintenance: None needed 4.4x faster. Built in 67 minutes. THE COMPARISON Agency approach: - Analyzed existing complexity - Added patches and fixes - "Optimized" inefficient structure - Charged $31,000 - Took 4 months
0 likes • 9d
67 minutes vs 4 months is insane but honestly not surprising. I've seen similar stuff where agencies pad timelines because they're billing hourly and have no incentive to be efficient. Sometimes a fresh pair of eyes building from scratch is 10x better than trying to patch someone else's mess. This is why more businesses are starting to look for independent builders instead of big agencies - faster, cheaper, and they actually care about the outcome.
Client's vendor charged $9k to "fix" a broken workflow. I looked at it for 2 minutes and changed one setting. Fixed.
Client's vendor charged $9k to "fix" a broken workflow. I looked at it for 2 minutes and changed one setting. Fixed. THE CRISIS Client: "Workflow stopped sending emails" Vendor: "Need full system diagnostic" Client: "How long?" Vendor: "3-5 days to identify the issue" Quote: $9,000 Includes: Architecture review, code audit, integration testing Client panicking. Losing sales without email notifications. THE CALL Client: "Can you look at it?" Me: "Share access" 2 minutes later. Me: "Found it" Client: "The problem?" Me: "And fixed it" Client: "What? How?" Me: "I used Skada AI" THE ISSUE Email rate limit setting: 10 per hour Client's volume: 50+ per hour Emails queued up, never sent. Changed setting to 100 per hour. Backlog cleared in 6 minutes. Client: "That's it?" Me: "That's it" THE VENDOR'S PLAN Day 1: System architecture review Day 2: Email service audit Day 3: Integration diagnostics Day 4: Testing environment setup Day 5: Issue resolution What they would've found: Rate limit too low Time to fix: 10 seconds Time to bill: 5 days Cost: $9,000 THE TEST Client sent test emails. All delivered instantly. Client processed 87 emails in next hour. All sent perfectly. Client: "I almost paid $9k for this" THE VENDOR'S RESPONSE Client: "Issue is fixed" Vendor: "We haven't started the diagnostic yet" Client: "Someone else fixed it" Vendor: "Impossible, we need to complete our process" Client: "Emails are sending" Vendor: "That's just temporary" 3 weeks later: Still working perfectly. MY "DIAGNOSTIC" PROCESS 1. Look at the workflow 2. Check obvious things first 3. Usually find it in under 5 minutes Client paid me $500. Saved $8,500. Fixed in 2 minutes vs 5 days. THE PATTERN Found 6 similar cases this month: "Broken" workflow 1: Wrong timezone setting - 30 seconds "Broken" workflow 2: Expired API key - 1 minute "Broken" workflow 3: Incorrect field mapping - 45 seconds "Broken" workflow 4: Filter set too narrow - 20 seconds "Broken" workflow 5: Trigger disabled by accident - 15 seconds
1 like • 9d
This is exactly why I got into automation freelancing. So many vendors out there overcomplicating things just to justify big invoices. Half the time it's literally a toggle or a missed connection that takes 5 minutes to spot if you actually know the tool. The real skill isn't even technical most of the time - it's knowing where to look. Clients need people who solve problems fast, not people who drag things out.
From Barely Getting By to Building Abundance
For a long time, my life was defined by a $600 monthly salary. I worked as a non-teaching staff member at a small college of education. I showed up every day, worked hard, and did everything expected of me, yet the money was never enough. Bills, family needs, and unexpected expenses kept me in a constant cycle of stress. No matter how careful I was, there was nothing left at the end of the month. There were days I skipped meals just to save money, and nights I stayed awake worrying about how I would survive the next month. I felt stuck—overworked, exhausted, and unseen. Everything changed when I reconnected with an old friend who once struggled just like me but had found success in an online business. She didn’t judge me or make me feel small. She simply said, “Let me show you what changed my life.” She introduced me to what she was doing and guided me step by step. At first, I doubted myself. I had no experience and was afraid of failing. But with her encouragement, I decided to try. Slowly, things began to change. In my first week, I earned more than I expected. By my first month, I had already made more than my college salary. For the first time in years, I felt hope. Today, with consistency, commitment, and the right mentorship, I now earn over $32,000 every month—something I never imagined possible when I was surviving on $600. I’m not sharing this to boast, but to remind you: Your background doesn’t limit your future. Your current struggle is not your final chapter. Sometimes, all you need is the courage to take one step in a new direction. If my story can change, so can yours.If you are also curious to know more about this toy can actually Dm me or message me on WhatsApp +1 (579) 385-3594
0 likes • 9d
Man this hits different. The $600/month grind while giving everything you've got and still barely making it - I think a lot of us in this space can relate to that feeling. What's powerful is that you didn't just accept it as your reality. Most people stay stuck because they think the ceiling they're at is just how life works. Glad you're building something bigger now, keep going
Not all marketing works the same
Marketing is basically how you attract the right people, show them what you offer, and guide them to buy. It’s not just posting content or running ads. It’s the full process of getting attention, building trust, and turning that attention into customers. Now here’s something very important: not all marketing techniques work the same for every business. Different businesses need different marketing strategies because customers don’t all buy in the same way. Take e-commerce for example. E-commerce works by bringing traffic to an online store and converting that traffic into buyers. Since customers can’t physically see or touch the product, strong visuals, ads, social media content, influencer marketing, and email marketing tend to work very well. These strategies help you reach more people quickly and build trust through your store, product pages, and reviews. Now compare that to a service-based business like coaching or consulting. If you use the same fast, product-style marketing used in e-commerce, it usually won’t work as well. That’s because people don’t rush into buying personal or emotional services. They need more trust, connection, and understanding first. For service businesses, education, storytelling, valuable content, and community building often work better because they help people feel safe and confident before making a decision. This is why you have to be careful when choosing a marketing strategy. Just because a technique works for one business doesn’t mean it will work for yours. The best marketing always matches your business model and how your customers actually make decisions. What do you think about this? And if you have any questions about marketing for your type of business, feel free to drop them in the comments 👇
0 likes • 9d
Really solid breakdown. The e-commerce vs SaaS comparison is something a lot of people miss. I've seen so many SaaS founders try to run Facebook ads like they're selling a physical product and wonder why nothing converts. With SaaS especially, the buying cycle is longer so content and trust building matters way more than flashy ad creatives. Understanding your customer's decision process changes everything about how you market.
1-7 of 7
Arsh Singh
2
14points to level up
@arsh-singh-2432
Founder of perisimium and Senvia.dev. Building automation and systems to help people out .

Active 3h ago
Joined Feb 24, 2026