I get this question a lot, so let's clear it up once and for all. What is Hospira bacteriostatic water? Hospira is the name-brand version, formerly made by Pfizer, and it's the same bacteriostatic water used in hospitals. If it has the pink top, a lot number, an expiration date, and all the Hospira branding — that's the real deal. Same product medical professionals are using. What about off-brand bacteriostatic water from peptide companies? Some peptide vendors make their own reconstitution solution. If you go this route, I'd recommend using one that's been tested — like the bacteriostatic water from EZ Peptides. The test confirms there's actual benzyl alcohol content in the solution, which is the key ingredient that keeps your peptide stable for roughly 6–8 weeks after reconstitution (sometimes a little longer). The simple way to think about it: This is just name brand vs. off-brand. Both can work. But if you've ever had issues with your peptides degrading or losing potency faster than expected, I'd recommend just going the Hospira route. It's a little pricier, but the peace of mind is generally worth it. TL;DR: - Hospira = hospital-grade, Pfizer-made, pink top, lot number + expiration date - Off-brand = works fine if it's tested for benzyl alcohol content - Had issues before? Go Hospira Hospira: https://peptideprice.store/peptide/bacteriostatic-water-hospira Off Brand: https://peptideprice.store/peptide/bacteriostatic-water Drop any questions below 👇

This question keeps coming up, so let's break it down once and for all. First, let's kill a myth: Peptide blends do NOT degrade each other over time. We've seen plenty of degradation studies on popular blends like Glow, KLOW, and the Wolverine Stack — they hold up just fine together. So that's not a reason to avoid them. So why do people choose blends? Two reasons: convenience and cost. And those are both completely valid. But here's where it gets tricky. I always steer people toward individual peptides if there's any chance they'll need to modulate or titrate their research amounts up or down based on biofeedback. Take GLOW for example — that's 50 mg GHK-Cu, 10 mg BPC-157, and 10 mg TB-500 in one vial. Sounds great on paper. But what happens when your research calls for more BPC and TB-500? Now your GHK-Cu amount is climbing right along with it — and you might not want or need that much GHK. The reality is, a lot of the time you don't know ahead of time whether you're going to need to adjust. And that's exactly the problem. When everything is locked into one ratio, you lose the ability to fine-tune. When DO blends make sense? If you already know your amounts are going to stay constant. Something like a GHK-Cu + KPV blend where you're holding both steady — that's a perfectly reasonable use case. No need to overcomplicate it. The bottom line: Are blends bad? Absolutely not. But combining too many things into one vial can leave you guessing — guessing what's causing a side effect, guessing what you need more or less of. Individual peptides give you full control. Convenience is great. Control is better. If you can go the individual route, that's what I recommend. If you know your protocol is dialed in and nothing's changing, a blend can save you time and money. Just know the trade-off going in. Drop any questions below 👇

Which bioregulators would you most like to see available? Drop your votes below and comment if there's one I missed. If possible, drop your top three. This will help a lot, thank you in advance.

I want to get ahead of this before it catches anyone off guard. Over the next couple of months, you're going to see a massive movement of peptide companies switching to new third-party testing labs. This isn't one or two vendors quietly making a change — this is shaping up to be an industry-wide shift, and I'm already seeing it play out behind the scenes. Why? The labs that have been the standard for a while now — Chromate, Vanguard, Freedom, MZ Biolabs — are falling short in ways that companies just can't work around anymore: - Freedom can't perform sterility or heavy metals testing. That's a huge gap in a full testing panel. - Vanguard and Chromate are stuck in turnaround time hell. Companies are waiting way too long to get results back, and that bottleneck affects everything — inventory, launches, restocks, you name it. When you can't get the full panel of testing AND you can't get results back in a reasonable timeframe, companies are going to look elsewhere. It's just not sustainable. What this means for you: You're going to start seeing COAs from labs you don't recognize. New names, new formats, maybe new terminology. That's okay — don't panic. A new lab doesn't automatically mean bad testing. It also doesn't automatically mean good testing. The key is knowing how to evaluate them. What I'm going to do: I'll do my best to keep you guys in the loop as these changes roll out. That means: - Breaking down how to read COAs from these newer labs - Doing background research into whether these labs are reputable - Calling out anything that looks sketchy This is one of those moments where the space is evolving in real time. Stay informed, ask questions, and as always — I've got your back.

Getting blood work done tomorrow morning. Is it ok to take my peps that should be taken while fasted before getting blood drawn? Morning is mots-c, NAd+ and 5-Amino.