This question keeps coming up, so let's break it down once and for all. First, let's kill a myth: Peptide blends do NOT degrade each other over time. We've seen plenty of degradation studies on popular blends like Glow, KLOW, and the Wolverine Stack — they hold up just fine together. So that's not a reason to avoid them. So why do people choose blends? Two reasons: convenience and cost. And those are both completely valid. But here's where it gets tricky. I always steer people toward individual peptides if there's any chance they'll need to modulate or titrate their research amounts up or down based on biofeedback. Take GLOW for example — that's 50 mg GHK-Cu, 10 mg BPC-157, and 10 mg TB-500 in one vial. Sounds great on paper. But what happens when your research calls for more BPC and TB-500? Now your GHK-Cu amount is climbing right along with it — and you might not want or need that much GHK. The reality is, a lot of the time you don't know ahead of time whether you're going to need to adjust. And that's exactly the problem. When everything is locked into one ratio, you lose the ability to fine-tune. When DO blends make sense? If you already know your amounts are going to stay constant. Something like a GHK-Cu + KPV blend where you're holding both steady — that's a perfectly reasonable use case. No need to overcomplicate it. The bottom line: Are blends bad? Absolutely not. But combining too many things into one vial can leave you guessing — guessing what's causing a side effect, guessing what you need more or less of. Individual peptides give you full control. Convenience is great. Control is better. If you can go the individual route, that's what I recommend. If you know your protocol is dialed in and nothing's changing, a blend can save you time and money. Just know the trade-off going in. Drop any questions below 👇

Hey everyone! Let's talk about the difference between regular NAD+ and buffered NAD+ peptides. Regular NAD+ Peptide: - Highly acidic when reconstituted (pH around 2-3) - Known for causing significant injection site pain and burning - Can feel like "liquid fire" going in - especially subQ - IV infusions often cause the "NAD flush" - chest tightness, facial flushing, discomfort - Nasal spray versions can irritate and burn nasal passages - Some people experience nausea or systemic discomfort during administration NAD+ Buffered Peptide: - Contains buffering agents (sodium bicarbonate or phosphate buffers) - pH adjusted to near-physiological levels (6.5-7.5) - DRAMATICALLY reduced injection site pain - Much smoother, more comfortable injections (subQ or IM) - Significantly less "flush" during IV administration - Better tolerated in nasal spray form - Way easier to stick with long-term protocols The Real Difference: Both deliver the same NAD+ molecule and have similar efficacy. The buffered version is simply formulated to match your body's natural pH, making it FAR more comfortable to administer. Bottom Line: If you've avoided NAD+ because of horror stories about injection pain, or if you've tried it and couldn't handle the discomfort - buffered is your answer. It's the same benefits without the torture. Running NAD+ in your stack? Which version are you using? Drop your experiences below! 👇

For research and educational purposes only. I get this question constantly: "Is GHK-Cu better taken in the morning or at night when it comes to results?" The short answer—night is generally better, but there are cases where morning use makes sense. Here's the clean, practical breakdown 👇 Why Night Is Usually Better It comes down to how your body works while you sleep. 1. Tissue repair happens during sleep GHK-Cu's main benefits are collagen remodeling, skin repair, hair follicle support, and anti-inflammatory signaling. These processes peak during deep sleep when growth hormone is higher and cellular turnover is increased. Night dosing aligns with the body's natural repair window. 2. Pairs well with the natural GH pulse GHK-Cu doesn't raise GH directly, but it enhances tissue responsiveness and supports extracellular matrix repair. Administering before bed complements the nighttime GH pulse the body naturally produces—so you're stacking the timing in your favor. 3. Fewer side effects noticed Some researchers report mild flushing, head pressure, or a "warm" feeling with GHK-Cu. These are less noticeable when administered at night since you're heading to sleep anyway. When Morning Can Make Sense That said, night dosing isn't mandatory. Here's when morning works just fine: Topical use (serums, creams) — AM or PM is fine, though PM is still preferred for the reasons above. If nighttime dosing affects sleep — This is rare, but some report it. If that's the case, switching to morning is a simple fix. Split dosing protocols — Some protocols call for AM + PM micro-doses for skin or hair research goals, spreading the exposure throughout the day. Timing by Administration Method So how does this break down in practice? Reconstituted GHK-Cu (SubQ) — Best timing is 30–60 min before bed. If sleep disruption occurs, morning works as an alternative. Frequency is typically daily or 5 days on / 2 days off. Topical GHK-Cu — AM or PM both work. PM is preferred if you want to maximize the regeneration window, but it's less critical than with SubQ.

I get this question a lot, so let's clear it up once and for all. What is Hospira bacteriostatic water? Hospira is the name-brand version, formerly made by Pfizer, and it's the same bacteriostatic water used in hospitals. If it has the pink top, a lot number, an expiration date, and all the Hospira branding — that's the real deal. Same product medical professionals are using. What about off-brand bacteriostatic water from peptide companies? Some peptide vendors make their own reconstitution solution. If you go this route, I'd recommend using one that's been tested — like the bacteriostatic water from EZ Peptides. The test confirms there's actual benzyl alcohol content in the solution, which is the key ingredient that keeps your peptide stable for roughly 6–8 weeks after reconstitution (sometimes a little longer). The simple way to think about it: This is just name brand vs. off-brand. Both can work. But if you've ever had issues with your peptides degrading or losing potency faster than expected, I'd recommend just going the Hospira route. It's a little pricier, but the peace of mind is generally worth it. TL;DR: - Hospira = hospital-grade, Pfizer-made, pink top, lot number + expiration date - Off-brand = works fine if it's tested for benzyl alcohol content - Had issues before? Go Hospira Hospira: https://peptideprice.store/peptide/bacteriostatic-water-hospira Off Brand: https://peptideprice.store/peptide/bacteriostatic-water Drop any questions below 👇

I get questions about reconstitution and research dosing constantly, so here's everything you need to know in one place. I'm building out a comprehensive FAQs section in the Classroom to answer all the common questions I get. If you're still confused after reading this, head over to the Reconstitution FAQ here: https://www.skool.com/peptide-price-9771/classroom/b7dcc989?md=5ef850cf36f5467b9fbb9811f9b69cbf The Most Important Thing to Understand The amount of BAC water you use is entirely up to you. There is no single "correct" amount—you're just choosing how concentrated you want the peptide to be. That said, there are practical guidelines that make the process much easier. My Simple Rule of Thumb (for peptides under 30mg) For every 1 mg of peptide, use 10 units of BAC water. Example with a single peptide: - 20 mg peptide - 10 units per mg - 20 × 10 = 200 units - 200 units = 2 mL of BAC water So you'd reconstitute a 20 mg vial with 2 mL of BAC water. Important Vial Size Rule For anything in a small vial that's over 30 mg, always use 3 mL of BAC water. That's simply the most that will fit in a standard small peptide vial. Once you go past 30 mg, you're no longer choosing concentration freely—you're limited by physical vial volume. What About Blends? For blends, add up the total peptide amount first, then apply the same logic. Example with a blend: - 10 mg BPC-157 - 10 mg TB-500 - Total peptide = 20 mg Now apply the rule: - 20 mg × 10 units = 200 units - 200 units = 2 mL BAC water Blends are reconstituted based on total mg, not each peptide individually. If the total blend exceeds 30 mg in a small vial, use 3 mL. Make It Even Easier With the Calculator I built a calculator specifically for this: https://peptideprice.store/calculator How to use it for a single peptide: 1. Enter Peptide Vial Amount (mg) 2. Enter BAC Water amount (mL) 3. Enter your desired dose 4. Select syringe size 5. Hit Calculate