yo, started using GSD 3 weeks ago - using it at home and at work.

Quick question for the experienced folks here. I'm brand new to claude code and GSD, used cursor and n8n a bunch 12 months ago, built a little business and then shut it down. I'm using GSD workflow and built a post-planning hook that verifies implementation patterns in my plans against Context7 documentation before execution. What it does: After /gsd:plan-phase completes, it extracts patterns from the PLAN.md files (install commands, config setups, import statements, API usage) and checks each one against current Context7 docs. Example check: - Plan says: ConvexProvider wraps BrowserRouter - Context7 query: "Is this still the correct provider hierarchy?" - Result: ✅ Current or ⚠️ Pattern changed Why I built it: I'm new to this and paranoid about executing plans with outdated patterns. The planner agent might be using stale knowledge, and I'd rather catch API changes before running code. My concern: Am I creating unnecessary overhead? Is this actually useful, or am I solving a problem that doesn't exist? More experienced users - do you verify plans before execution, or do you just trust the planner and fix issues as they come up?

Since the latest updates, GSD and Claude have been buggy. GSD injected 38% context on a new project, and Claude answers the questions and make changes itself. Anyone else with this behavior?

Hey everyone! Just learned about GSD this week and looking forward to actually get shit done. Excited to be here.