Officially launched Orchestrate subagents at scale with dynamic workflows - Claude Code Docs https://share.google/2PdwWfxSphHXwbn8M @Nate Herk that's quite interesting. I am a novice but I am wondering how this could help setup a teams of agents that drain a prd while we sleep :)

Started this whole AI journey thinking I'd build something impressive in week one. Week two I was still confused about what tool to even start with. Kept comparing myself to people posting wins and thought maybe this just wasn't for me. Then I stopped trying to build the "right" thing and just built whatever annoyed me most that week. First automation saved me maybe 20 minutes. Second one I'd actually use every day. Turns out the gap between "I don't know where to start" and "this is actually working" is way smaller than it looks from the outside — it's just not a straight line. What was the thing that finally made it click for you?

Let's get to know each other! Comment below sharing where you are in the world, a career goal you have, and something you like to do for fun. 😊

So I'm sure you guys have heard the term "AI slop", and everyone sorta defines it differently. Maybe you think it's those TikToks of AI-generated fruits going on dates. Maybe it's infographics with misspelled words. Maybe it's something else entirely. But I want to talk about it in the context of communication. Internal, external, content you put out into the world. I write my LinkedIn posts with AI. My agent knows my business, how I write, how I speak. That's just how I work now. And there's nothing wrong with that. I think everyone should be using AI to write if it makes them more efficient. But this isn't a binary yes or no. It's a spectrum. Sometimes AI can draft and send automatically. Most of the time, I want it to just draft. Then I review. If someone sends me an email with em dashes everywhere, I don't actually care at all that they used AI. The fact that I can clearly tell it's AI-generated isn't the problem. What I do start asking is: → Did they proofread this? → Is this completely accurate? And subconsciously, I might start losing trust. Not just in the email but in the person who sent it. Our job here has changed from writer to reviewer. This quote has really stuck with me: "You can outsource your thinking, but you can never outsource your understanding." When your name is attached to the content, you take credit if it lands, as you should. But that also means you need to take accountability if it's incorrect. Taste and reviewing are becoming more important than ever. AI is super intelligent and powerful, but I don't want to see a world where we trust AI so much, that we stop reviewing things, and then the human on the other end of the content starts losing trust in us. That's why even though I write with AI, and people know that, I still try my best to disguise it and make it sound as "Nate" as possible. Check out the LinkedIn post I just wrote about this HERE