Case Study 87: “Flip-Flop” Screening Machine. Work Ends in Fatal Crush
Incident Overview
A heavy screening machine (“flip-flop/Trisomat screen”) was being handled as part of a replacement task. The operation involved crane use and subsequent movement/handling steps. A worker was fatally crushed.
What Went Wrong
The job had multiple phases and the hazard profile changed after the initial crane movement. Planning and control did not effectively cover the full sequence and stability risks.
Key Lessons
“Phase 2” is where people drop standards
Stability and route control matter after the lift
One task can contain multiple high-risk activities
Safety Recommendations
Plan the entire job end-to-end. Re-brief after each phase. Control stability, movement routes, and stop points.
Incident source/ Reference
UK HSE-linked reporting on the fatal screening
●LOLER Reg. 8 – Plan the full job, not just the first lift.
●PUWER Reg. 4 – Method must be suitable for each phase.
●PUWER Reg. 11 – Crush zones must be prevented/controlled.
●BS 7121-1 – Sequence control and stability must be managed.
Key point
Phase changes require re-control.
Wolf Lifting Dynamics – Safe Lifting UK | Case Study 87
0
0 comments
Vlad Lupu
2
Case Study 87: “Flip-Flop” Screening Machine. Work Ends in Fatal Crush
powered by
Safe Lifting UK
skool.com/wolf-lifting-dynamics-9548
This community shares real lifting case studies, consultancy insights, and site-proven lessons covering cranes, supervision, planning, and execution.
Build your own community
Bring people together around your passion and get paid.
Powered by